Cited by 1,469Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesEducational Research and MethodsSchool Choice and Performance

Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment.

Thistlethwaite, Donald L., Campbell, Donald T.·1960·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This study presents a method of testing casual hypotheses, called regression-discontinuity analysis, in situations where the investigator is unable to randomly assign Ss to experimental and control groups. The Ss were selected from near winners--5126 students who received certificates of merit and 2

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0044319

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large family of efficacy and effectiveness designs now exists, including designs that randomize across persons, places, and time, and nonrandomized designs such as pre-post comparisons, regression discontinuity, time series, and multiple baseline comparisons.

    “There is now a large family of designs for testing efficacy or effectiveness that randomize across persons, place, and time (or combinations of these) (15), as well as designs that do not use randomization, such as pre-post comparisons, regression discontinuity (106), time series and multiple baseline comparisons (5).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1960-12
Volume
51
Issue
6
Pages
309-317
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2141019942
Cited by
1,469
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 137 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 82 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 52
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
causal inference, non-random assignment, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review