The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics
Abstract
Party activists have played a leading role in “conflict extension”—the polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensions—in contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the same time, the extent to which elite-level polarization has influenced the belief systems of ordinary citizens remains a matter of debate8,27,35–40.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, partisanship exacerbates issue-based conflict27, and party activists are capable of pushing candidates to take more extreme positions on issues over time37.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Historically speaking, polarization in the USA reflects social patterns that began with Southern realignment following civil rights legislation, the rise of single-issue interest groups, changes in campaign finance law, and the withdrawal of moderates from party politics and primary races, especially on the political right10,27,31,34,37,72,342,343).”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
Robinson, J., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226398 · Cited by 6,650
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,262
Elder, J. W., Geertz, C., & Rosenhack, K. P. S. (1964) · Cited by 3,878
A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004 · Cited by 3,008
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Oldfield, 1996, The Right and the Righteous
- 10.1080/01621459.1957.10501379 · DOI
- Poole, 2006, Ideology and Congress: 2nd
- Black, 2007, Divided America
- 10.2307/448823 · DOI
- Aldrich, 2001, Congress Reconsidered, 269
- Miller, 1986, Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 348
Rain and Representation: The Effect of Margin of Victory on Incumbent Legislative BehaviorPreprint
Henderson, J. A., & Brooks, J. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2409078 · Cited by 2
Campaign Finance and Primary ElectionsPreprint
Albert, Z., Desmarais, B. A., & Raja, R. J. L. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2909026 · Cited by 2
Contentious Institutions and Party Orders in American PoliticsPreprint
Hejny, J., & Hilton, A. (2021) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2021-w6lbr · Cited by 2
#Polarized Feeds - Two Experiments on Polarization and Social MediaPreprint
Banks, A. V., Karol, D., Calvo, E. F., & Telhami, S. Z. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3122880 · Cited by 2
King-Meadows, T. D., Agarwal, V., & Nalubula, P. N. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13110594 · Cited by 1
Lights, Camera, Inaction? The Effects of Gavel-to-Gavel Floor Coverage on U.S. State Legislatures
Lyons, J., & Ryan, J. M. (2025) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055425101032 · Cited by 1
Gill, H., Lee, H., Kim, S. Y., Liao, X., & Rojas, H. (2025) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf053 · Cited by 1
Procedural Polarization: How Election Rules Shape Voters’ Confidence
Clinton, J. D. (2026) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305542610166x · Cited by 1
Politik in der Krise? Polarisierungsdynamiken im politischen Prozess
Sirakov, D. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-02642-4_37 · Cited by 1
A Paradox in Polarization? Cross‐pressured Representatives and the Missing Incentive to Moderate
Toll, B. T. (2019) · World Affairs · doi:10.1177/0043820019825934 · Cited by 1
Jewitt, C. E., & Shufeldt, G. (2021) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x211022317 · Cited by 1
Internal Politics and Activism in Former Rebel Parties
Ibáñez, M., & Jäger, K. (2022) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2022.33 · Cited by 1
Timing and responsiveness in American political advertising campaigns
Banda, K. K. (2024) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.13391 · Cited by 1
Perrett, S., & Baldassarri, D. (2024) · Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties · doi:10.1080/17457289.2024.2364734 · Cited by 4
Negotiating around Obstruction: Legislative Effectiveness in the US Senate
Johnston, T. M. (2018) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096517001962 · Cited by 1
Rallying Around the Party: A Theory of Party Identity Linkage
Freeze, M. (2012) · DukeSpace (Duke University) · Cited by 1
Issue Ownership vs. Conflict Extension: Understanding State Party PolarizationPreprint
Coffey, D. J. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2439490 · Cited by 1
Error Duration Models: A New Justification for Fractional Integration in Political Time SeriesPreprint
Grant, T. L. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2641555 · Cited by 1
Critical Elections, Partisan Realignment, and Long-Term Electoral Change in American Politics
Carmines, E. G., & Schmidt, E. R. (2018) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0246 · Cited by 1
From Personal to Partisan: Abortion, Party and Religion in the California State Assembly, 1967-1996Preprint
Karol, D., & Thurston, C. N. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3122882 · Cited by 1
Entre George W. Bush ( 2000 / 2008) e Barack H. Obama ( 2009)
Finguerut, A. (2014) · doi:10.47749/t/unicamp.2014.926706 · Cited by 1
Alrababa’h, A., Casalis, M., Masterson, D., Hangartner, D., Wehrli, S., & Weinstein, J. M. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/gyz3h · Cited by 1
How Nationalized are American State Publics?Preprint
Santucci, J. (2025) · doi:10.33774/apsa-2025-h52kz
The Tea Party and Social Movements
Palmer, D. S. (2011) · Bucknell Digital Commons (Bucknell University)
A Review of “Noel, Hans.Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America”
Brewer, M. D. (2015) · Congress & the Presidency · doi:10.1080/07343469.2015.991634
Clark, C., & Tan, A. C. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal
Gridlock or Leadership in U.S. Electoral Politics
Schnidman, E. A., & Schofield, N. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_11
Essays on Religion and Political Behavior: How Religion Facilitates Political Development and Change
Ammann, S. L. (2014) · UWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee)
Building Blocs: The Group Origins of Cultural Conservatism in the Republican PartyPreprint
Baylor, C. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2136673
PARTY FIT IN THE U.S. CONGRESS: THE INTERSECTION OF IDEOLOGY, POLITICAL PARTIES, AND GENDER
Thomsen, D. M. (2014) · eCommons (Cornell University)
Polarizing Issues in the American Political Parties: Women In Party Platforms
Vail, H. (2014) · DigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)
Presidential Influence on Partisans' OpinionsPreprint
Edwards, G. C. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2576444
Competing Partisan Regimes and the Transformation of the Voting Rights Act, 1965-2015
Rhodes, J. H. (2015) · Transatlantica · doi:10.4000/transatlantica.7437
Representation, neighboring districts, and party loyalty in the U.S. Congress
Kirkland, J. H., & Williams, R. L. (2015) · Public Choice · doi:10.1007/s11127-016-0307-x
Political Alignments in America
Atkinson, M. (2012) · eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Quandaries of Gridlock and Leadership in US Electoral Politics
Schnidman, E. A., & Schofield, N. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35239-3_5
When Will People Learn? Democracy Just Doesn’t Work
Wood, J. T. (2014) · The Eagle Feather · doi:10.12794/tef.2014.312
Coffey, D. J. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2611816
Politik in der Krise? Polarisierungsdynamiken im politischen Prozess der USA
Sirakov, D. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-04125-0_37-1
Refining (and Redefining) the Party
Dowdle, A. J., Limbocker, S., Yang, S., Sebold, K., & Stewart, P. A. (2013) · Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137318602_2
Arslan‐Ayaydin, Ö., & Thewissen, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32268-1_3
Caughey, D., Dunham, J., & Warshaw, C. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2853674
The Old Regime and the Conservative Dilemma
Ziblatt, D. F. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139030335.003
Reading the Tea Leaves: An Exploration of the Origins, Composition, and Influence of the Tea Party
Summary, B. (2013) · IRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4922.7607
Groups Agendas as the Root of Party Position Change
Baylor, C. (2017) · The Forum · doi:10.1515/for-2017-0043
Bateman, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108556323.005
Party Structure and Representational Impact
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.002
Election Patterns and INTERPRETIVE Frameworks
Stonecash, J. M. (2012)
Why American Jewish Politics Is Puzzling
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.002
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.001
Party Structure and Representational Impact
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.003
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.007
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.006
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.004
Party Structure in Theory and in Practice
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.001
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.005
Shafer, B. E., & Wagner, R. L. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108753517.008
How Jews Fell in Love with the American Regime
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.004
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.003
Jewish Political Culture in the Early National Period
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.005
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.011
Consolidating Jewish Political Culture
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.006
Early-Twentieth-Century Challenges to Jewish Political Culture
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.007
Resurgence of Democratic Partisanship in the Post–New Deal Era
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.009
The Persistence of the Jewish Liberal Tradition
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.010
Carriers of the Creed: Examining Democrats’ Commitment to Egalitarianism as Principle and Policy
Lupton, R., Myers, W. M., & Thornton, J. R. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09792-4
Stonecash, J. M. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139333733.005
Ashbee, E., Dumbrell, J. W., & Waddan, A. (2019) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781788114806.00012
Wolbrecht, C., & Corder, J. K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316941331.010
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.012
Jewish Political Culture During the “Long Sixties” and After
Wald, K. D. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108597388.008
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0004
Measuring Policy Orientations and Political Sophistication
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0004
A Test of How Elite Polarization Shapes Mass Political Behavior
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0007
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0002 · Cited by 1
How Political Sophistication Shapes Responses to Elite Polarization
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0008
Elite Polarization and Americans’ Perceptions of the Political Parties
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0003
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0007
The Relationships between Policy Orientations, Partisanship, and Vote Choice
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0006
The Implications of Our Polarized Politics
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0009
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.002.0003
A Test of the Recursive Relationship between Policy Orientations and Partisanship
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0005
Zingher, J. N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197630693.003.0001
Campaign Finance and Political Polarization When Purists Prevail
(2015) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.1353/book.42636
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.002.0006
Partisanship, Policy, Compromise, and the Non-Political
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0004
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0001
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.002.0003
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.002.0004
Partisanship and Ideology in Political Decision-Making
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0002
Elite Cues, Negative Partisanship, and the Changing Media Landscape
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0003
Partisanship, Race, and Intergroup Contact
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0005
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.002.0008
Prospect Theory and Partisan Cues
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0006
Independents, Political Knowledge, and Alienation
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0008
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.005.0001
An Elite Problem Calls for an Elite Solution
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0009
Political Responsiveness to the Lived Experience
Dyck, J. J., & Pearson‐Merkowitz, S. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197623787.003.0007
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0002
Metadata
- Authors
- LAYMAN, G. C., CARSEY, T. M., GREEN, J. C., HERRERA, R., & COOPERMAN, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Akron (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Mary Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- LAYMAN, GEOFFREY C.
- CARSEY, THOMAS M.
- GREEN, JOHN C.
- HERRERA, RICHARD
- COOPERMAN, ROSALYN
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 324-346
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2107628037
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 105.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- party activists, interparty conflict, candidate positions, party commitment, partisan polarization, American party politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
