The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 94 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics
Abstract
Party activists have played a leading role in “conflict extension”—the polarization of the parties along multiple issue dimensions—in contemporary American politics. We argue that open nomination systems and the ambitious politicians competing within those systems encourage activists with extreme views on a variety of issue dimensions to become involved in party politics, thus motivating candidates to take noncentrist positions on a range of issues. Once that happens, continuing activists with strong partisan commitments bring their views into line with the new candidate agendas, thus extending the domain of interparty conflict. Using cross-sectional and panel surveys of national convention delegates, we find clear evidence for conflict extension among party activists, evidence tentatively suggesting a leading role for activists in partisan conflict extension more generally, and strong support for our argument about change among continuing activists. Issue conversion among activists has contributed substantially to conflict extension and party commitment has played a key role in motivating that conversion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the same time, the extent to which elite-level polarization has influenced the belief systems of ordinary citizens remains a matter of debate8,27,35–40.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, partisanship exacerbates issue-based conflict27, and party activists are capable of pushing candidates to take more extreme positions on issues over time37.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
In the citing paper
“Historically speaking, polarization in the USA reflects social patterns that began with Southern realignment following civil rights legislation, the rise of single-issue interest groups, changes in campaign finance law, and the withdrawal of moderates from party politics and primary races, especially on the political right10,27,31,34,37,72,342,343).”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 · Cited by 20,015
An Economic Theory of Democracy.
Banfield, E. C., & Downs, A. J. (1958) · Midwest Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2109186 · Cited by 18,558
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
Robinson, J., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226398 · Cited by 6,650
Eulau, H. H. F. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952653 · Cited by 4,744
The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,262
Elder, J. W., Geertz, C., & Rosenhack, K. P. S. (1964) · Cited by 3,878
A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models
Bollen, K. A. (1989) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004 · Cited by 3,008
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Oldfield, 1996, The Right and the Righteous
- 10.1080/01621459.1957.10501379 · DOI
- Poole, 2006, Ideology and Congress: 2nd
- Black, 2007, Divided America
- 10.2307/448823 · DOI
- Aldrich, 2001, Congress Reconsidered, 269
- Miller, 1986, Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–348 of 348
What Future Do We Want? Evaluating Judicial Independence
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0014
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.002.0003
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0007
Voting in the Shadow of Accountability
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0011
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.002.0008
New Politics, New Justices, New Policies
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0012
Bipartisanship in congressional voting
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0002
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.002.0007
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.002.0004
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.002.0003
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0005
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0006
The Candidates for the Court and the Nominees
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0004
Cameron, C. M., Kastellec, J., Bass, L., & Dean, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0006
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0003
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0001
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0013
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0010
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0015
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. P. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.002.0005
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0008
Cameron, C. M., & Kastellec, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0005
The Logic of Presidential Selection
Cameron, C. M., Kastellec, J., & Mattioli, L. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197680537.003.0009
The Trans-Pacific Partnership and international trade
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0008
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0007
Spending on foreign aid and diplomacy
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0009
Military intervention in Syria
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0004
Implications and bipartisanship under Biden
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0010
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.002.0008
The persistence and forms of bipartisanship
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0001
Tama, J. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197745663.003.0003
Building bridges for consensus via alternative voting methods
Gibbs, T., Oreský, J., & Hong, S. (2024) · Innovation The European Journal of Social Science Research · doi:10.1080/13511610.2024.2383365
Hilton, A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197794937.003.0007
Kinsella, C. J., & Li, A. (2025) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-025-11426-1
Albert, Z., & Raja, R. J. L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5347061
No One Mourns the Wicked: The Limits of Partisan Hostility Persisting through Tragedy
Marsh, W. Z. C. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2025.10019
Sari, E. (2025) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2025.2599575
Treating a friend to voter registration in a Divided America
Hood, M. V., McKee, S. C., Shino, E., & Smith, D. A. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0337176
Clinton, J. D. (2025) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096525101662
Populism, Emotions, and Boundary Work Among Political Activists in the Trump Era
Tuğal, C., Smucker, J. M., & Roberts, K. (2026) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2025.2612496
Albert, Z., & Raja, R. J. L. (2020) · Politique américaine · doi:10.3917/e.polam.035.0015
A Renaissance in State Interest Group Studies
Garlick, A., & Holyoke, T. T. (2026) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1017/spq.2026.10019
The Dynamics of Anti-Establishment Politics
Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Stoler, J. B., & Uscinski, J. E. (2026) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-026-10161-8
Portin, F. (2026) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2026.2697266
The Electorate’s Ratings of Joe Biden’s Ideology from 2020 to 2024: An Evaluation of Biden’s Legacy
Morris, Z. (2026) · The Evolving American Presidency · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-28130-2_5
Sex and the city: A spatial analysis of shifting attitudes toward gay rights
Kinsella, C. J., McTague, C., & Raleigh, K. N. (2026) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2026.107428
Seeing the climate from above: U.S. policy options and economic elite attitudes
Miller, C. J. (2026) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/s41269-026-00438-5
Metadata
- Authors
- LAYMAN, G. C., CARSEY, T. M., GREEN, J. C., HERRERA, R., & COOPERMAN, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Akron (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Mary Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- LAYMAN, GEOFFREY C.
- CARSEY, THOMAS M.
- GREEN, JOHN C.
- HERRERA, RICHARD
- COOPERMAN, ROSALYN
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 324-346
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2107628037
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 105.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- party activists, interparty conflict, candidate positions, party commitment, partisan polarization, American party politics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
