The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation
Abstract
This article challenges the liberal, contractual theory of the corporation and argues for replacing it with a political theory of the corporation. Corporations are government-like in their powers, and government grants them both their external “personhood” and their internal governing authority. They are thus not simply private. Yet they are privately organized and financed and therefore not simply public. Corporations transgress all the basic dichotomies that structure liberal treatments of law, economics, and politics: public/private, government/market, privilege/equality, and status/contract. They are “franchise governments” that cannot be satisfactorily assimilated to liberalism. The liberal effort to assimilate them, treating them as contractually constituted associations of private property owners, endows them with rights they ought not have, exacerbates their irresponsibility, and compromises their principal public benefit of generating long-term growth. Instead, corporations need to be placed in a distinct category—neither public nor private, but “corporate”—to be regulated by distinct rules and norms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(76)90026-x · Cited by 71,491
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529
The Human Condition: Second Edition
Arendt, H., Canovan, M., & Allen, D. (2018) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226586748.001.0001 · Cited by 10,123
The theory of communicative action
(2014) · The Philosophy of Habermas · doi:10.4324/9781315710495-5 · Cited by 8,634
(1985) · Cited by 7,244
Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology
Weber, M. (2002) · Readings in Economic Sociology · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch3 · Cited by 6,867
Participation and Democratic Theory
Pateman, C. (1970) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511720444 · Cited by 6,159
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600307 · Cited by 5,897
The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business
Douglass, E. P., & Chandler, A. D. (1978) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1862020 · Cited by 4,538
Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/b:busi.0000039399.90587.34 · Cited by 3,968
Metadata
- Authors
- CIEPLEY, D.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-01-30
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-158
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2165834268
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 31.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0003055412000536
- The paper
- CIEPLEY, D. (2013). Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055412000536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.