Cited by 412Political Conflict and GovernanceTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceMilitary History and Strategy

Organizing Rebellion: Rethinking High-Risk Mobilization and Social Networks in War

PARKINSON, SARAH ELIZABETH·2013·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Research on violent mobilization broadly emphasizes who joins rebellions and why , but neglects to explain the timing or nature of participation. Support and logistical apparatuses play critical roles in sustaining armed conflict, but scholars have not explained role differentiation within militant organizations or accounted for the structures, processes, and practices that produce discrete categories of fighters, soldiers, and staff. Extant theories consequently conflate mobilization and participation in rebel organizations with frontline combat. This article argues that, to understand wartime mobilization and organizational resilience, scholars must situate militants in their organizational and social context. By tracing the emergence and evolution of female-dominated clandestine supply, financial, and information networks in 1980s Lebanon, it demonstrates that mobilization pathways and organizational subdivisions emerge from the systematic overlap between formal militant hierarchies and quotidian social networks. In doing so, this article elucidates the nuanced relationship between social structure, militant organizations, and sustained rebellion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003055413000208

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on rebellion makes similar claims: the within-network spread of information and resources is thought to be critical.

    “Research on rebellion, another form of collective action in which dissidents seek policy or regime change, makes similar claims.The within-network spread of information and resources-such as through dense quotidian ties and homogenous ethnic networks-is thought to be critical(Lewis 2020;Parkinson 2013).”

    From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Parkinson 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PARKINSON, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
PARKINSON, SARAH ELIZABETH
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2013-07-24
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
418-432
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2014843341
Cited by
412
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
43.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
Keywords
armed insurgency, militant groups, social networks, financial networks, information networks, organizational resilience, role differentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review