Organizing Rebellion: Rethinking High-Risk Mobilization and Social Networks in War
Abstract
Research on violent mobilization broadly emphasizes who joins rebellions and why , but neglects to explain the timing or nature of participation. Support and logistical apparatuses play critical roles in sustaining armed conflict, but scholars have not explained role differentiation within militant organizations or accounted for the structures, processes, and practices that produce discrete categories of fighters, soldiers, and staff. Extant theories consequently conflate mobilization and participation in rebel organizations with frontline combat. This article argues that, to understand wartime mobilization and organizational resilience, scholars must situate militants in their organizational and social context. By tracing the emergence and evolution of female-dominated clandestine supply, financial, and information networks in 1980s Lebanon, it demonstrates that mobilization pathways and organizational subdivisions emerge from the systematic overlap between formal militant hierarchies and quotidian social networks. In doing so, this article elucidates the nuanced relationship between social structure, militant organizations, and sustained rebellion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on rebellion makes similar claims: the within-network spread of information and resources is thought to be critical.
“Research on rebellion, another form of collective action in which dissidents seek policy or regime change, makes similar claims.The within-network spread of information and resources-such as through dense quotidian ties and homogenous ethnic networks-is thought to be critical(Lewis 2020;Parkinson 2013).”
From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Parkinson 2013
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557 · see citing works
Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties
Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/521848 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Wood, E. J. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808685 · Cited by 1,644 · see citing works
The Social Processes of Civil War: The Wartime Transformation of Social Networks
Wood, E. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104832 · Cited by 668 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
HAGGARD, S., & KAUFMAN, R. R. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000287 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
What Explains Counterterrorism Effectiveness? Evidence from the U.S. Drone War in Pakistan
Mir, A. (2018) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec_a_00331 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Natural hazards, internal migration and protests in Bangladesh
Petrova, K. (2021) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343320973741 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Repression in the Digital Age: Surveillance, Censorship, and the Dynamics of State Violence
Gohdes, A. R. (2024) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743577.001.0001 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Pearlman, W. (2021) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414020912281 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Acosta, B. (2016) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343315618001 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
HASSAN, M. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000291 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nationwide shutdowns and government offensives
Gohdes, A. R. (2024) · Repression in the Digital Age · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197743577.003.0005
- Authors
- PARKINSON, S. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- PARKINSON, SARAH ELIZABETH
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-07-24
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 418-432
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2014843341
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 43.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Military History and Strategy
- Keywords
- armed insurgency, militant groups, social networks, financial networks, information networks, organizational resilience, role differentiation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review