Cited by 95Media Influence and PoliticsMedia Studies and CommunicationMisinformation and Its Impacts

Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication

CARLSON, TAYLOR N.·2019·American Political Science Review

Abstract

Much of the US public acquires political information socially. However, the consequences of acquiring information from others instead of the media are under-explored. I conduct a “telephone-game” experiment to examine how information changes as it flows from official reports to news outlets to other people, finding that social information is empirically different from news articles. In a second experiment on a nationally representative sample, I randomly assign participants to read a news article or a social message about that article generated in Study 1. Participants exposed to social information learned significantly less than participants who were exposed to the news article. However, individuals exposed to information from someone who is like-minded and knowledgeable learned the same objective facts as those who received information from the media. Although participants learned the same factual information from these ideal informants as they did from the media, they had different subjective evaluations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s000305541900008x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such a two-step process undercuts the information content and tone in the original message, often in biased ways.

    “Carlson (2019Carlson ( , 2024) ) shows that such a process undercuts the information content and tone in the original message, often in biased ways (e.g., to reflect one's partisan leanings).”

    From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Carlson, 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CARLSON, T. N.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
CARLSON, TAYLOR N.
Venue
American Political Science Review
Published
2019-02-28
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
325-339
ISSN
  • 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5943
OpenAlex
W2918175664
Cited by
95
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
20.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
social information, news media, political information acquisition, information transmission, political knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review