Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication
Abstract
Much of the US public acquires political information socially. However, the consequences of acquiring information from others instead of the media are under-explored. I conduct a “telephone-game” experiment to examine how information changes as it flows from official reports to news outlets to other people, finding that social information is empirically different from news articles. In a second experiment on a nationally representative sample, I randomly assign participants to read a news article or a social message about that article generated in Study 1. Participants exposed to social information learned significantly less than participants who were exposed to the news article. However, individuals exposed to information from someone who is like-minded and knowledgeable learned the same objective facts as those who received information from the media. Although participants learned the same factual information from these ideal informants as they did from the media, they had different subjective evaluations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such a two-step process undercuts the information content and tone in the original message, often in biased ways.
“Carlson (2019Carlson ( , 2024) ) shows that such a process undercuts the information content and tone in the original message, often in biased ways (e.g., to reflect one's partisan leanings).”
From How to study democratic backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Carlson, 2019
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · see citing works
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Political scientists were initially skeptical that the media could influence opinions (Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee 1954; Campbell et al. 1960), butmost research since then argues that the media can indeed impact public opinion (Bartels 1993; Iyengar and Kinder 1987; Popkin 1994; Zaller 1992).”
BackgroundEvaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 · Cited by 4,008 · see citing works
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006 · Cited by 1,992 · see citing works
Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through Crowdsourced Content Analysis
Budak, C., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw007 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions
Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12325 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning about Political Facts
Hill, S. J. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/692739 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Framework for the Study of Persuasion
Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-110428 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
How to study democratic backsliding
Druckman, J. N. (2024) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12942 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- CARLSON, T. N.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- CARLSON, TAYLOR N.
- ORCID
- CARLSON, TAYLOR N.
- Venue
- American Political Science Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-339
- ISSN
- 0003-0554 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5943
- OpenAlex
- W2918175664
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 20.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Political Science Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Keywords
- social information, news media, political information acquisition, information transmission, political knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review