Cited by 42Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Style, Chauvet and radiocarbon

Valladas, Hélène, Clottes, Jean·2003·Antiquity

Abstract

The article by Bahn and Pettitt (above) carries the suggestion that the diverse dates obtained for Candamo in some way throw doubt on those for Chauvet and by implication on the performance of the Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE) at Yvette-sur-Gif (Gif). The authors respond. Readers might also like to note the article by Marian Scott and colleagues which follows.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003598x00061433

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valladas, H., & Clottes, J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2003-03
Volume
77
Issue
295
Pages
142-145
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W2200983921
Cited by
42
References
11
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
Chauvet Cave, radiocarbon dating, cave art

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review