Cited by 8Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solutreanism

O'Brien, Michael J., Boulanger, Matthew T., Collard, Mark, Buchanan, Briggs, Tarle, Lia, Straus, Lawrence G., Eren, Metin I.·2014·Antiquity

Abstract

The comments of Stanford and Bradley (above) do not address our criticisms and obfuscate the topic at hand with irrelevant data (e.g. the south-to-north movement of fluted points through the Ice Free Corridor), nonexistent data (e.g. ‘under the water’ or ‘destroyed sites’), and questionable data (e.g. Meadowcroft and Cactus Hill are by no means widely accepted, nor are Stanford and Bradley's ‘eight LGM sites’ in the mid-Atlantic region). Before touching on some of these points, we direct the reader to several recent articles (e.g. Morrow 2014; Raff & Bolnick 2014) that provide new evidence or arguments inconsistent with a trans-Atlantic migration, including the fact that DNA from the Clovis Anzick child (Montana) shows no European ancestry (Rasmussen et al. 2014). Although Stanford and Bradley describe their Solutrean ‘solution’ (Stanford & Bradley 1999) to the Pleistocene colonisation of North America as ‘testable’, their position is that the idea is correct until falsified. They propose that their colleagues have yet to provide sufficient ‘critiques’ or ‘challenges’ to discount it (see also Collins 2012; Collins et al. 2013). Yet they are the ones proposing a hypothesis inconsistent with overwhelming multidisciplinary evidence, and they ignore results of tests that do not support their claims.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003598x00101243

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Stanford, 1999, Abstract: constructing the Solutrean solution
  2. Collins, 2013, Paleoamerican odyssey, 521
  3. Lowery D.L. 2009. Geoarchaeological investigations at selected coastal archaeological sites on the Delmarva Peninsula: the long term interrelationship between climate, geology, and culture. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.
  4. Collins, 2012, Across Atlantic ice
  5. Stanford, 2002, The first Americans: the Pleistocene colonization of the New World (Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 27), 255

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
O'Brien, M. J., Boulanger, M. T., Collard, M., Buchanan, B., Tarle, L., Straus, L. G., & Eren, M. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Tulsa (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2014-06-01
Volume
88
Issue
340
Pages
622-624
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W4244456858
Cited by
8
References
9
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Funders
Smithsonian Institution
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
transatlantic migration, Clovis, fluted points, ice-free corridor, European ancestry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review