Cited by 97Biblical Studies and InterpretationArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeology and Historical Studies

Reassessing the chronology of Biblical Edom: new excavations and14C dates from Khirbat en-Nahas (Jordan)

Levy, Thomas E., Adams, Russell B., Najjar, Mohammad, Hauptmann, Andreas, Anderson, James D., Brandl, Baruch, Robinson, Mark A., Higham, Thomas·2004·Antiquity

Abstract

An international team of researchers show how high-precision radiocarbon dating is liberating us from chronological assumptions based on Biblical research. Surface and topographic mapping at the large copper-working site of Khirbat en-Nahas was followed by stratigraphic excavations at an ancient fortress and two metal processing facilities located on the site surface. The results were spectacular. Occupation begins here in the eleventh century BC and the monumental fortress is built in the tenth. If this site can be equated with the rise of the Biblical kingdom of Edom it can now be seen to: have its roots in local Iron Age societies; is considerably earlier than previous scholars assumed; and proves that complex societies existed in Edom long before the influence of Assyrian imperialism was felt in the region from the eighth – sixth centuries BC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0003598x0011350x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The large set of 14C readings from Khirbet en-Nahas seems to indicate that the site reached its peak prosperity in the first half of the 9th century BCE, in the early Iron IIA.

    “The large set of 14 C readings from Khirbet en-Nahas (Levy et al. 2004(Levy et al. , 2005) ) seems to indicate that the site reached its peak prosperity in the first half of the 9th century BCE (Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2008), that is, in the early Iron IIA, parallel to the wave of settlement in the Beer Sheba Valley, Besor region, and Negev Highlands.”
  • The commencement of the wave of settlement in the Beer Sheba Valley, Besor region, and the Negev Highlands may have been connected to the increase in copper production at Khirbet en-Nahas.

    “The commencement of the wave of settlement in the Beer Sheba Valley, Besor region, and the Negev Highlands may have been connected to the increase in copper production at Khirbet en-Nahas in the eastern Arabah, “the largest Iron Age copper-smelting site in the southern Levant” (Levy et al. 2004:867;Hauptmann 2007:127).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levy, T. E., Adams, R. B., Najjar, M., Hauptmann, A., Anderson, J. D., Brandl, B., Robinson, M. A., & Higham, T.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Deutsches Bergbau-Museum Bochum (DE)
  • North Island College (CA)
  • Israel Antiquities Authority (IL)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Antiquity
Published
2004-12
Volume
78
Issue
302
Pages
865-879
ISSN
  • 0003-598X (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1744
OpenAlex
W2492480145
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
76.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Antiquity (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johnson Family Foundation
  • American Center of Research
  • University of California, San Diego
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
Keywords
Edom, radiocarbon dating, chronology, Iron Age, ancient fortresses, metalworking, Assyrian imperialism, biblical archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review