The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indicators of zinc status at the population level: a review of the evidence
Open accessAbstract
The role of zinc deficiency as an important cause of morbidity and impaired linear growth has prompted the need to identify indicators of population zinc status. Three indicators have been recommended – prevalence of zinc intakes below the estimated average requirement (EAR), percentage with low serum zinc concentrations, and percentage of children aged < 5 years who are stunted. This review outlines steps to estimate the prevalence of inadequate intakes, and confirm their validity based on the EARs set by International Zinc Nutrition Collaborative Group. Next, the appropriateness of serum zinc as a biochemical marker for population zinc status is confirmed by a summary of: (a) the response of serum zinc concentrations to zinc intakes; (b) usefulness of serum zinc concentrations to predict functional responses to zinc interventions; (c) relationship between initial serum zinc and change in serum zinc in response to interventions. Height- or length-for-age was chosen as the best functional outcome after considering the responses of growth, infectious diseases (diarrhoea, pneumonia), and developmental outcomes in zinc supplementation trials and correlation studies. The potential of other zinc biomarkers such as zinc concentrations in hair, cells, zinc-metalloenzymes, and zinc-binding proteins, such as metallothionein, is also discussed. Molecular techniques employing reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction to measure mRNA in metallothionein and ZIP1 transporter hold promise, as do kinetic markers such as exchangeable zinc pools (EZP) and plasma zinc turnover rates. More research is needed to establish the validity, specificity, sensitivity, and feasibility of these new biomarkers, especially in community-settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Principles Of Nutritional Assessment
Gibson, R. S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195171693.001.0001 · Cited by 1,887
Self-citationSerum thymulin in human zinc deficiency
Prasad, A. S., Meftah, S., Abdallah, J., Kaplan, J., Brewer, G. J., Bach, J. F., & Dardenne, M. (1988) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci113717 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Raiten, D. J., Ashour, F. A. S., Ross, A. C., Meydani, S. N., Dawson, H. D., Stephensen, C. B., Brabin, B. J., Suchdev, P. S., & van Ommen, B. (2015) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.114.194571 · Cited by 234
Zinc: Dietary intake and impact of supplementation on immune function in elderly
Mocchegiani, E., Romeo, J., Malavolta, M., Costarelli, L., Giacconi, R., Diaz, L.-E., & Marcos, A. (2013) · AGE · doi:10.1007/s11357-011-9377-3 · Cited by 198
Micronutrient status of recreational runners with vegetarian or non-vegetarian dietary patterns
Nebl, J., Schuchardt, J. P., Ströhle, A., Wasserfurth, P., Haufe, S., Eigendorf, J., Tegtbur, U., & Hahn, A. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11051146 · Cited by 55
Zhang, C., Li, J., Tian, L., Lu, D., Yuan, K., Yuan, Y., & Xu, S. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep09658 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibson, R. S., Hess, S. Y., Hotz, C., & Brown, K. H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- S3
- Pages
- S14-S23
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2110745296
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Indicators of zinc status at the population level: a review of the evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007114508006818
- The paper
- Gibson, R. S., Hess, S. Y., Hotz, C., & Brown, K. H. (2008). Indicators of zinc status at the population level: a review of the evidence. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114508006818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.