Cited by 1,887Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health StudiesNutrition and Health in Aging

Principles Of Nutritional Assessment

Gibson, Rosalind S·2005

Abstract

This is a comprehensive text on the methods—dietary, anthropometric, laboratory and clinical—of assessing the nutritional status of populations and of individuals in the hospital or the community. The second edition incorporates recent data from national nutritional surveys in the US and Europe; the flood of new information about iron, vitamin A and iodine; the role of folate in preventing neural tube defects; the use of HPLC techniques and enzyme assays; improvements in data handling; and many other developments since 1990.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195171693.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Gibson, Rosalind S
Published
2005-03-31
OpenAlex
W4388242791
Cited by
1,887
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 84
FWCI
39.97
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
nutritional assessment, nutritional status, dietary assessment, anthropometry, hospital nutrition, community nutrition, iron nutrition, vitamin A, iodine, folic acid, neural tube defects, HPLC, enzyme activity assay, nutritional surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review