The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method
Open accessAbstract
The aim of the present study was to report the first reliability and validity tests of the remote food photography method (RFPM), which consists of camera-enabled cell phones with data transfer capability. Participants take and transmit photographs of food selection and plate waste to researchers/clinicians for analysis. Following two pilot studies, adult participants (n 52; BMI 20–35 kg/m 2 inclusive) were randomly assigned to the dine-in or take-out group. Energy intake (EI) was measured for 3 d. The dine-in group ate lunch and dinner in the laboratory. The take-out group ate lunch in the laboratory and dinner in free-living conditions (participants received a cooler with pre-weighed food that they returned the following morning). EI was measured with the RFPM and by directly weighing foods. The RFPM was tested in laboratory and free-living conditions. Reliability was tested over 3 d and validity was tested by comparing directly weighed EI to EI estimated with the RFPM using Bland–Altman analysis. The RFPM produced reliable EI estimates over 3 d in laboratory (r 0·62;P < 0·0001) and free-living (r 0·68;P < 0·0001) conditions. Weighed EI correlated highly with EI estimated with the RFPM in laboratory and free-living conditions (r>0·93;P < 0·0001). In two laboratory-based validity tests, the RFPM underestimated EI by − 4·7 % (P = 0·046) and − 5·5 % (P = 0·076). In free-living conditions, the RFPM underestimated EI by − 6·6 % (P = 0·017). Bias did not differ by body weight or age. The RFPM is a promising new method for accurately measuring the EI of free-living individuals. Error associated with the method is small compared with self-report methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method
Schoeller, D. A., Bandini, L. G., & Dietz, W. H. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1139/y90-143 · Cited by 266
Yon, B. A., Johnson, R. K., Harvey-Berino, J., Gold, B. C., & Howard, A. B. (2007) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9092-1 · Cited by 175
Measuring individual plate waste in school lunches
Comstock, E. M., St.Pierre, R. G., & Mackiernan, Y. D. (1981) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(21)39368-3 · Cited by 144
Assessing dietary intake in the management of obesity
O'Neil, P. M. (2001) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1002/oby.2001.9.s5.361 · Cited by 48 · cited 2×
“These prompts utilised EMA((29)) principles and consisted of emails and text messages; (3) Participants were provided with a telescoping pen to standardise the distance of the camera from the food and were instructed to take photographs at a 458 angle; (4) Participants were instructed to record their EI using traditio…”
Cited by
Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing
Dhurandhar, N. V., Schoeller, D., Brown, A. W., Heymsfield, S. B., Thomas, D., Sørensen, T. I. A., Speakman, J. R., Jeansonne, M., Allison, D. B., & the Energy Balance Measurement Working Group (2015) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2014.199 · Cited by 567
Wearable and Mobile Sensors for Personalized Nutrition
Sempionatto, J. R., Montiel, V. R.-V., Vargas, E., Teymourian, H., & Wang, J. (2021) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.1c00553 · Cited by 237
Daugherty, B. L., Schap, T. E., Ettienne-Gittens, R., Zhu, F. M., Bosch, M., Delp, E. J., Ebert, D. S., Kerr, D. A., & Boushey, C. J. (2012) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1967 · Cited by 176
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E. (2013) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512001353 · Cited by 144
Four weeks of probiotic supplementation reduces GI symptoms during a marathon race
Pugh, J. N., Sparks, A. S., Doran, D. A., Fleming, S. C., Langan-Evans, C., Kirk, B., Fearn, R., Morton, J. P., & Close, G. L. (2019) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-019-04136-3 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, C. K., Han, H., Coulon, S. M., Allen, H. R., Champagne, C. M., & Anton, S. D.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-07-11
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 446-456
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2156323397
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007114508027438
- The paper
- Martin, C. K., Han, H., Coulon, S. M., Allen, H. R., Champagne, C. M., & Anton, S. D. (2008). A novel method to remotely measure food intake of free-living individuals in real time: the remote food photography method. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114508027438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
