Cited by 144Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

‘My Meal Mate’ (MMM): validation of the diet measures captured on a smartphone application to facilitate weight loss

Open access
Carter, Michelle C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., Cade, J. E.·2013·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Accurate dietary assessment is an essential foundation of research in nutritional epidemiology. Due to the weaknesses in current methodology, attention is turning to strategies that automate the dietary assessment process to improve accuracy and reduce the costs and burden to participants and researchers. ‘My Meal Mate’ (MMM) is a smartphone application designed to support weight loss. The present study aimed to validate the diet measures recorded on MMM against a reference measure of 24 h dietary recalls. A sample of fifty volunteers recorded their food and drink intake on MMM for 7 d. During this period, they were contacted twice at random to conduct 24 h telephone recalls. Daily totals for energy (kJ) and macronutrients recorded on MMM were compared against the corresponding day of recall using t tests for group means and Pearson's correlations. Bland–Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement between the methods. Energy (kJ) recorded on MMM correlated well with the recalls (day 1:r 0·77 (95 % CI 0·62, 0·86), day 2:r 0·85 (95 % CI 0·74, 0·91)) and had a small mean difference (day 1 (MMM − recall): − 68 kJ/d (95 % CI − 553, 418 kJ) ( − 16 kcal/d, 95 % CI − 127, 100 kcal); day 2 (MMM − recall): − 441 kJ/d (95 % CI − 854, − 29 kJ) ( − 105 kcal/d, 95 % CI − 204, − 7 kcal)). Bland–Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement between the methods: − 3378 to 3243 kJ/d ( − 807 to 775 kcal/d) on day 1. At the individual level, the limits of agreement between MMM and the 24 h recall were wide; however, at the group level, MMM appears to have potential as a dietary assessment tool.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114512001353

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. British Journal of Nutrition https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512001353 Published online by Cambridge University Press References

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Carter, Michelle C.
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2012-05-03
Volume
109
Issue
3
Pages
539-546
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2110274521
Cited by
144
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
FWCI
15.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
mobile application, dietary assessment, 24-hour dietary recall, validation, energy intake, macronutrients, weight loss, dietary intake
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Intake, Diet, Reducing, England, Female, Humans, Hyperphagia, Male, Motivation, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Mental Recall, Reproducibility of Results, Weight Loss, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records, Body Mass Index, Cell Phone, Precision Medicine, Meals, Portion Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review