Cited by 567Obesity, Physical Activity, DietPhysical Activity and HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing

Open access
Dhurandhar, N V, Schoeller, D, Brown, A W, Heymsfield, S B, Thomas, D, Sørensen, T I A, Speakman, J R, Jeansonne, M +2 more·2015·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Energy intake (EI) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) are key modifiable determinants of energy balance, traditionally assessed by self-report despite its repeated demonstration of considerable inaccuracies. We argue here that it is time to move from the common view that self-reports of EI and PAEE are imperfect, but nevertheless deserving of use, to a view commensurate with the evidence that self-reports of EI and PAEE are so poor that they are wholly unacceptable for scientific research on EI and PAEE. While new strategies for objectively determining energy balance are in their infancy, it is unacceptable to use decidedly inaccurate instruments, which may misguide health-care policies, future research and clinical judgment. The scientific and medical communities should discontinue reliance on self-reported EI and PAEE. Researchers and sponsors should develop objective measures of energy balance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ijo.2014.199

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-reported diet measurements are inaccurate and imprecise.

    “While self-reported diet measurements are notoriously inaccurate and imprecise34–36, it may be possible to reconcile such data with objectively quantified increases in calorie intake.”
  • The measurement errors of self-reported energy intake are sufficiently large and nonrandom that they have led to consistent and statistically significant correlations in the opposite direction from the true correlation for some relationships.

    “The measurement errors are sufficiently large and nonrandom that they have led to consistent and statistically significant correlations in the opposite direction from the true correlation for some relationships.”
  • Self-reported energy intake method is invalid compared with objective measurements of actual energy intake.

    “The method, compared with objective measurements of actual energy intake, turns out to be invalid (19), not just “limited” or “imperfect.””

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]LS F Recommendations, Dissents and Comments for [Freedman LS et al Am J Epidemiol 2014 180 2 172 88 F1000Prime.com: F1000Prime; 2014 [cited 2014 05 Oct]; Available from: F1000Prime.com/718445976 24918187 PMC4082341

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dhurandhar, N. V., Schoeller, D., Brown, A. W., Heymsfield, S. B., Thomas, D., Sørensen, T. I. A., Speakman, J. R., Jeansonne, M., Allison, D. B., & the Energy Balance Measurement Working Group
Affiliations
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Allison, D B
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2014-11-13
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
1109-1113
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W1998997127
Cited by
567
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK062710, P30DK056336)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
energy balance, energy intake, physical activity energy expenditure, self-report accuracy, objective measurement, obesity research, measurement error, dietary assessment
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Energy Intake, Energy Metabolism, Health Policy, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Motor Activity, Policy Making, Reproducibility of Results, Self Report, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review