The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies
Open accessAbstract
The present paper explores the relative importance of liking and taste preferences as correlates of fruit and vegetable (FV) intakes among schoolchildren in Europe. The paper first provides an overview of potential determinants of food choice among children and subsequently summarizes the results of two recent observational studies on determinants of FV intakes among school-aged children. It is proposed that taste preferences and liking are important for children's food choices as part of a broader spectrum of nutrition behaviour determinants. Taste preferences and liking are important for motivation to eat certain foods, but social-cultural and physical environmental factors that determine availability and accessibility of foods, as well as nutrition knowledge and abilities should also be considered. Study 1 shows that children with a positive liking for FV have a greater likelihood to eat fruits (odds ratio (OR) = 1·97) or vegetables (OR = 1·60) every day, while ability and opportunity related factors such as knowledge, self-efficacy, parental influences and accessibility of FV were also associated with likelihood of daily intakes (ORs between 1·16 and 2·75). These results were consistent across different countries in Europe. Study 2 shows that taste prerences were the stongest mediator of gender differences in FV intakes among children; the fact that girls eat more could for a large extend be explained by there stronger taste preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
Longitudinal tracking of adolescent smoking, physical activity, and food choice behaviors
Kelder, S. H., Perry, C. L., Klepp, K. I., & Lytle, L. L. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.7.1121 · Cited by 1,388
Cited by
Smart food policies for obesity prevention
Hawkes, C., Smith, T. G., Jewell, J., Wardle, J., Hammond, R. A., Friel, S., Thow, A. M., & Kain, J. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61745-1 · Cited by 836
Evans, C. E., Christian, M. S., Cleghorn, C. L., Greenwood, D. C., & Cade, J. E. (2012) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.030270 · Cited by 488
Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions
Appleton, K. M., Hemingway, A., Saulais, L., Dinnella, C., Monteleone, E., Depezay, L., Morizet, D., Armando Perez-Cueto, F. J., Bevan, A., & Hartwell, H. (2016) · European Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1007/s00394-015-1130-8 · Cited by 275
Cerin, E., Barnett, A., & Baranowski, T. (2009) · Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2009.03.129 · Cited by 176
Vegetables and other core food groups: A comparison of key flavour and texture properties
Poelman, A. A. M., Delahunty, C. M., & de Graaf, C. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.09.004 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Brug, J., Tak, N. I., te Velde, S. J., Bere, E., & de Bourdeaudhuij, I.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S7-S14
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2109544620
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007114508892458
- The paper
- Brug, J., Tak, N. I., te Velde, S. J., Bere, E., & de Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2008). Taste preferences, liking and other factors related to fruit and vegetable intakes among schoolchildren: results from observational studies. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114508892458
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.