Cited by 93Obesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing EducationPhysical Activity and Health

A school-based obesity control programme: Project Energize. Two-year outcomes

Open access
Rush, Elaine, Reed, Peter, McLennan, Stephanie, Coppinger, Tara, Simmons, David, Graham, David·2012·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Through-school nutrition and physical activity interventions are designed to help reduce excess weight gain and risk of chronic disease. From 2004 to 2006, Project Energize was delivered in the Waikato Region of New Zealand as a longitudinal randomised controlled study of 124 schools (year 1–6), stratified by rurality and social deprivation, and randomly assigned to intervention or control. Children (686 boys and 662 girls) aged 5 (1926) and 10 (1426) years (692 interventions and 660 controls) had height, weight, body fat (by bioimpedance) and resting blood pressure (BP) measured at baseline and 2 years later. Each intervention school was assigned an ‘Energizer’; a trained physical activity and nutrition change agent, who worked with the school to achieve goals based on healthier eating and quality physical activity. After adjustment for baseline measures, rurality and social deprivation, the intervention was associated with a reduced accumulation of body fat in younger children and a reduced rate of rise in systolic BP in older children. There was some evidence that the pattern of change within an age group varied with rurality, ethnicity and sex. We conclude that the introduction of an ‘Energizer led’ through-school programme may be associated with health benefits over 2 years, but the trajectory of this change needs to be measured over a longer period. Attention should also be paid to the differing response by ethnicity, sex, age group and the effect of rurality and social deprivation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114511003151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rush, E., Reed, P., McLennan, S., Coppinger, T., Simmons, D., & Graham, D.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Rush, Elaine
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2011-07-07
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
581-587
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W2058713922
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Tuwhera (Auckland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health, New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
childhood obesity, school-based intervention, nutrition education, physical activity promotion, body fat accumulation, blood pressure, rurality, social deprivation, ethnicity, sex differences, children aged 5-10, change agents, Waikato region
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adipose Tissue, Age Factors, Body Composition, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Female, Food Services, Health Promotion, Humans, Hypertension, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motor Activity, New Zealand, Obesity, Rural Health, School Health Services, Sex Characteristics, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review