The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review
Open accessAbstract
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important pulse crop grown and consumed all over the world, especially in the Afro-Asian countries. It is a good source of carbohydrates and protein, and protein quality is considered to be better than other pulses. Chickpea has significant amounts of all the essential amino acids except sulphur-containing amino acids, which can be complemented by adding cereals to the daily diet. Starch is the major storage carbohydrate followed by dietary fibre, oligosaccharides and simple sugars such as glucose and sucrose. Although lipids are present in low amounts, chickpea is rich in nutritionally important unsaturated fatty acids such as linoleic and oleic acids. β-Sitosterol, campesterol and stigmasterol are important sterols present in chickpea oil. Ca, Mg, P and, especially, K are also present in chickpea seeds. Chickpea is a good source of important vitamins such as riboflavin, niacin, thiamin, folate and the vitamin A precursor β-carotene. As with other pulses, chickpea seeds also contain anti-nutritional factors which can be reduced or eliminated by different cooking techniques. Chickpea has several potential health benefits, and, in combination with other pulses and cereals, it could have beneficial effects on some of the important human diseases such as CVD, type 2 diabetes, digestive diseases and some cancers. Overall, chickpea is an important pulse crop with a diverse array of potential nutritional and health benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Types of Dietary Fat and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Critical Review
Hu, F. B., Manson, J. E., & Willett, W. C. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.2001.10719008 · Cited by 902
Alajaji, S. A., & El-Adawy, T. A. (2006) · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2006.03.015 · Cited by 429
DIETARY FIBER AND BODY-WEIGHT REGULATION
Pereira, M. A., & Ludwig, D. S. (2001) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70351-5 · Cited by 372
A High-Affinity Iron Permease Essential for Candida albicans Virulence
Ramanan, N., & Wang, Y. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5468.1062 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Monk, J. M., Lepp, D., Wu, W., Pauls, K. P., Robinson, L. E., & Power, K. A. (2017) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.08.002 · Cited by 85
Vinod, B. R., Asrey, R., Rudra, S. G., Urhe, S. B., & Mishra, S. (2023) · Food Chemistry Advances · doi:10.1016/j.focha.2023.100473 · Cited by 41
Ramu, R., Shirahatti, P. S., Zameer, F., & Nagendra Prasad, M. N. (2015) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.6698 · Cited by 40
Noordraven, L. E. C., Kim, H.-J., Hoogland, H., Grauwet, T., & Van Loey, A. M. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10112622 · Cited by 18
Ruiz-Zambrano, N. L., Pérez-Carrillo, E., Serna-Saldívar, S. O., & Tejada-Ortigoza, V. (2024) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2023.2237577 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Jukanti, A. K., Gaur, P. M., Gowda, C. L. L., & Chibbar, R. N.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-23
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S11-S26
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2046743796
- Cited by
- 1,000
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0007114512000797
- The paper
- Jukanti, A. K., Gaur, P. M., Gowda, C. L. L., & Chibbar, R. N. (2012). Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. British Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114512000797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.