Cited by 16Food composition and propertiesProteins in Food SystemsMicrobial Inactivation Methods

Effect of thermal, nonthermal, and combined treatments on functional and nutritional properties of chickpeas

Ruiz-Zambrano, Nidia Leticia, Pérez-Carrillo, Esther, Serna-Saldívar, Sergio O., Tejada-Ortigoza, Viridiana·2024·Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition

Abstract

Cicer arietinum or chickpea is an important and highly nutritious pulse, a source of complex carbohydrates, proteins, vitamins, and minerals, considered non-allergenic, and non-GMO crop. Processing technologies play an important role in modifying some chickpea properties and thus increasing its nutritional and health benefits. Herein is summarized and compared the available data on nutritional and functional aspects caused by thermal, nonthermal, and combinations of treatments for chickpea processing. The study focuses on describing the processing conditions necessary to change chickpea matrices aiming to enhance compound bioavailability, reduce anti-nutritional factors and modify functional characteristics for industrial application in product development. Thermal and nonthermal treatments can modify nutrient composition and bioavailability in chickpea matrices. Thermal treatments, moist or dry, prevent microbial spoilage, increase product palatability and increase protein quality. Nonthermal treatments aim to shorten the processing time and use less energy and water sources. Compared to thermal treatments, they usually preserve organoleptic attributes and bioactive compounds in chickpea matrices. Some treatment combinations can increase the efficacy of single treatments. Combined treatments increase antioxidant concentration, protein digestibility and available starch contents. Finally, despite differences among their effects, single and combined treatments can improve the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10408398.2023.2237577

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz-Zambrano, N. L., Pérez-Carrillo, E., Serna-Saldívar, S. O., & Tejada-Ortigoza, V.
Affiliations
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
  • Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Centro de Biotecnología FEMSA, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
Corresponding author
Tejada-Ortigoza, Viridiana
Venue
Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
Published
2023-07-27
Volume
64
Issue
31
Pages
11356-11374
ISSN
  • 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7852
OpenAlex
W4385294606
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
chickpea, thermal processing, non-thermal processing, combination therapy, functional properties, nutritional properties, bioavailability, antinutritional factors, protein digestibility, antioxidant activity, starch availability, pulse processing, food processing
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Biological Availability, Food Handling, Hot Temperature, Humans, Nutritive Value, Starch, Cicer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review