Effects of synbiotic supplementation on metabolic parameters and apelin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common causes of infertility in women of reproductive age. Insulin resistance is a main pathophysiologic feature in these patients. According to some studies, the intake of probiotic bacteria may improve glucose homoeostasis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of synbiotics on metabolic parameters and apelin in PCOS patients. This randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted on eighty-eight PCOS women aged 19–37 years old. The participants were randomly assigned to two groups receiving (1) synbiotic supplement ( n 44), and (2) placebo ( n 44) for 12 weeks. Fasting blood samples were taken at baseline and after 12 weeks. The two groups showed no difference in fasting blood sugar (adjusted mean difference: 0·60; 95 % CI −3·80, 5·00, P =0·727), plasma glucose fasting 2-h (adjusted mean difference 2·09; 95 % CI −9·96, 14·15, P =0·134), HbA1c (adjusted mean difference 0·06; 95 % CI −0·09, 0·22, P =0·959), homoeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (adjusted mean difference: 0·02; 95 % CI −0·99, 1·03, P =0·837), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) (adjusted mean difference: −0·02; 95 % CI −0·33, 0·29, P =0·940) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (adjusted mean difference: 0·24; 95 % CI −1·61, 2·08, P =0·141) by the end of the intervention. A significant difference was observed in the mean apelin 36 before and after the intervention between synbiotic and placebo groups (adjusted mean difference: −4·05; 95 % CI −7·15, −0·96, P =0·004). A 12-week synbiotic supplementation has no significant beneficial effects on HOMA-IR and CRP in PCOS patients, whereas the level of apelin 36 significantly decreased.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The resulting dysbiosis has been shown to be reversible after interventions aimed at improving diet quality or treatment with probiotics or synbiotics.
“The resulting dysbiosis has been shown to be reversible after interventions aimed at improving diet quality or treatment with probiotics or synbiotics [50,51,56,57,58].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
Dysbiosis is reversible with improvement in diet quality augmented by the addition of probiotics or synbiotics.
“Dysbiosis is reversible with improvement in diet quality augmented by the addition of probiotics or synbiotics [51,56,57,58].”
From Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment (2022) · cites this paper as [58]
Cites
Tremellen, K., & Pearce, K. (2012) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2012.04.016 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Probiotic intervention has strain-specific anti-inflammatory effects in healthy adults
Kekkonen, R. A., Lummela, N., Karjalainen, H., Latvala, S., Tynkkynen, S., Järvenpää, S., Kautiainen, H., Julkunen, I., Vapaatalo, H., & Korpela, R. (2008) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.14.2029 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Farrell, K., & Antoni, M. H. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.081 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment
Parker, J., O’Brien, C., Hawrelak, J., & Gersh, F. L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19031336 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Evolutionary Adaptation to Lifestyle and the Environment
parker, J., O'Brien, C., Hawrelak, J., & Gersh, F. (2021) · doi:10.20944/preprints202112.0088.v1 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Parker, J., O'Brien, C., & Hawrelak, J. (2022) · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science · doi:10.5468/ogs.21185 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Liao, D., Zhong, C., Li, C., Mo, L., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Minerva Medica · doi:10.23736/s0026-4806.18.05728-2 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karimi, E., Moini, A., Yaseri, M., Shirzad, N., Sepidarkish, M., Hossein-Boroujerdi, M., & Hosseinzadeh-Attar, M. J.
- Affiliations
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Roointan Arash Hospital (IR)
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute (IR)
- Royan Institute (IR)
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-02-28
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 398-406
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2792068740
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2018-03-02)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- polycystic ovary syndrome, synbiotic supplementation, apelin, insulin resistance, glucose homeostasis, probiotics, prebiotics, C-reactive protein, HOMA-IR, QUICKI, HbA1c, women's health, infertility, metabolic parameters, ovulation induction, endometriosis, endometrial receptivity
- MeSH terms
- Apelin, Adult, Blood Glucose, C-Reactive Protein, Double-Blind Method, Fasting, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Probiotics, Young Adult, Synbiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review