Cited by 31Ovarian function and disordersProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Meta-analysis of the effects of probiotic supplementation on glycemia, lipidic profiles, weight loss and C-reactive protein in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome

Liao, Dan, Zhong, Chunhua, Li, Cuifen, Mo, Lifang, Liu, Yanyan·2018·Minerva Medica

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have been designed to investigate the beneficial effects of probiotic supplementation on metabolic parameters and inflammation status in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), but results have been inconsistent. Herein, we perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of probiotic supplementation on glycemia control, lipidic profiles, weight loss and C-reactive protein (CRP) in women with PCOS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: MELINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs that investigated the effects of probiotic in women with PCOS. Two investigators independently performed the screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment. Data were pooled as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test. Sensitivity analyses were performed by the leave-one-out approach. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: From the literature search, 26 publications were screened and 6 RCTs involving 406 PCOS participants (aged 25-28.5 years) with follow-up period between 8-12 weeks were included. The pooled results showed that probiotic supplement significantly affected the levels of fasting blood insulin (FBI), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), triglycerides (TG), and very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C). However, no significant changes were found in other markers, including fasting plasma glucose, homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, body weight, CRP, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels. The pooled result was robust after the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding provides evidence that daily probiotic consumption has beneficial effects on decreasing FBI, TG, and VLDL-C, and increasing the QUICKI score in PCOS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23736/s0026-4806.18.05728-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liao, D., Zhong, C., Li, C., Mo, L., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
Southern Medical University (CN)
Venue
Minerva Medica
Published
2018-12
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
479-487
ISSN
  • 0026-4806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1827-1669
OpenAlex
W2904554634
Cited by
31
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Minerva Medica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, polycystic ovary syndrome, glycemic control, insulin resistance, fasting insulin, QUICKI, triglycerides, VLDL cholesterol, lipid profile, weight loss, C-reactive protein, inflammation, women
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, C-Reactive Protein, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Triglycerides, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review