The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimising the follow-up of adult coeliac disease with a clinical-based score to identify patients in need of a histological reassessment: a retrospective single centre study
Open accessAbstract
Follow-up modalities for adult coeliac patients remain controversial. Non-invasive markers to identify coeliac patients on a gluten-free diet (GFD) with persistence of villous atrophy (VA) are still lacking. We aim to develop a score to stratify coeliac patients on a GFD according to their risk of having persistent VA and to tailor follow-up modalities accordingly. The clinical notes of over 700 coeliac patients attending our unit (September 1999–November 2018) were retrospectively examined. A total of 273 patients on a GFD with a histological follow-up performed 12–24 months after diagnosis were selected. We developed a bivariable model based on diet adherence and clinical response evaluated by previously validated methods. A four-level score (0·5, 1·5, 3, 4) was obtained. Patients on a strict GFD and with good clinical conditions (score 4) have a very low risk of persistence of VA (2 (95 % CI 1, 5) %). Conversely, the risk is very high (46 (95 % CI 25, 68) %) in patients with poor adherence to a GFD and unsatisfactory clinical response (score 0·5). A score of 1·5 (poor GFD adherence and persistent well-being) is linked with a high risk (23 (95 % CI 14, 36) %). Risk is intermediate (6 (95 % CI 3, 10) %) in patients scoring 3 (strict GFD and no/partial clinical improvement). Three patients who developed complications belonged to this scenario. Patients at low risk of persistent VA can be followed-up non-invasively, whereas a biopsy should be repeated in those at high/very high risk. Case-by-case evaluation is needed in patients at intermediate risk. Studies on a larger sample size are required to confirm these data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is general consensus about the need to assess adherence to the gluten-free diet during follow-up of celiac disease patients.
“There is general consensus about the need to assess adherence to the GFD during the follow up of CD patients (48-50).”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Al-Toma, A., Volta, U., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., Sanders, D. S., Cellier, C., Mulder, C. J., & Lundin, K. E. A. (2019) · United European Gastroenterology Journal · doi:10.1177/2050640619844125 · Cited by 1,012
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1136/bmj.h4513 · DOI
- 10.1093/jnci/djq564 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02621.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00042737-200203000-00017 · DOI
- Hutchinson, 2010, Long-term histological follow-up of people with coeliac disease in a UK teaching hospital, QJM, 103, 511, 10.1093/qjmed/hcq076 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03820.x · DOI
- 10.1111/apt.12510 · DOI
- 10.1080/003655201750305477 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03992.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.12.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.156 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2013.79 · DOI
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.11.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.252 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004836-200311000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2010.10 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0007114511007367 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301346 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/apt.12164 · DOI
- 10.3109/07853890.2014.913378 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.006 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2015.155 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2012.220 · DOI
- 10.1136/gut.30.3.333 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.dld.2017.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1111/apt.14101 · DOI
- 10.1038/ajg.2017.357 · DOI
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310148 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05554-4 · DOI
- 10.1111/apt.14048 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-230X-14-139 · DOI
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306578 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03311.x · DOI
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308567 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease.
Mearin, M. L., Agardh, D., Antunes, H., Al‐toma, A., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., Catassi, C., Ciacci, C., Discepolo, V., Dolinsek, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003540 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Harder, G., Schiepatti, A., Biagi, F., Borrelli de Andreis, F., Agazzi, S., Gabrielli, G. M., & Klersy, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Biagi, Federico
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020-02-20
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1159-1164
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W3008913941
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Collegio Ghislieri di Pavia
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Keywords
- adult celiac disease, villous atrophy, gluten-free diet adherence, clinical response, risk stratification score, follow-up strategy, non-invasive monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aftercare, Atrophy, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Duodenum, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Patient Selection, Diet, Gluten-Free
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review