Cited by 50Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBody Composition Measurement TechniquesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Non-linear relationship between the body roundness index and metabolic syndrome: data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2018

Open access
Li, Zhenhan, Fan, Chunhua, Huang, Jun, Chen, Zhongpei, Yu, Xiaoxia, Qian, Jun·2024·British Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Obesity is an important characteristic manifestation of metabolic syndrome (MetS), and body roundness index (BRI) is one of the anthropometric indicators associated with obesity. However, studies on the relationship between BRI and MetS risk are limited. We aimed to explore the relationship between baseline BRI and MetS in the USA population. Our study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2018, ultimately enrolling and analysing 47 303 participants. Data-driven tertiles were used to categorise BRI levels, and multivariate logistic regression models were fitted to investigate the association of BRI with MetS in adults. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to assess the ability of BRI to predict MetS. The distribution of BRI was different across ethnic groups with a gradual decrease in the proportion of non-Hispanic Whites and other races. In addition, BRI was significantly associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Univariate regression analysis indicated BRI to be a moderate risk factor for MetS, and multivariate logistic regression analysis found that BRI remained an independent risk factor for MetS. After adjusting for confounding variables, a non-linear relationship was found between BRI levels and the prevalence of MetS. More importantly, BRI predicted MetS with the largest AUC among anthropometric measures. In summary, elevated baseline BRI levels are independently associated with the development of MetS, and baseline BRI may assist in identifying patients at risk for MetS, leading to early and optimal treatment to improve their outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0007114524000357

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRI has been recognized as a reliable indicator for assessing NAFLD-associated conditions such as T2DM, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome.

    “It has been recognized as a reliable indicator for assessing NAFLD-associated conditions such as T2DM, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome [45, 46].”

    From Effectiveness of body roundness index for the prediction of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) identify BRI as a better predictor of metabolic syndrome than other traditional anthropometric indices. The paper describes insulin resistance as a characteristic of metabolic syndrome and notes a relationship between metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, but it does not establish BRI as an indicator for assessing either condition separately or in a NAFLD population. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding aligns with existing evidence and reinforces the potential of BRI as a robust predictor for identifying individuals at high risk of MetS.

    “This finding not only aligns with existing evidence but also reinforces the potential of BRI as a robust predictor for identifying individuals at high risk of MetS [29, 30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Fan, C., Huang, J., Chen, Z., Yu, X., & Qian, J.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College (CN)
  • Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Qian, Jun
Venue
British Journal of Nutrition
Published
2024-02-15
Volume
131
Issue
11
Pages
1852-1859
ISSN
  • 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2662
OpenAlex
W4391842637
Cited by
50
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 10
FWCI
16.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tongji University
  • Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body roundness index, metabolic syndrome, obesity, anthropometric indicators, nonlinear relationship, cardiovascular risk factors, ethnic differences, risk prediction, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Risk Factors, United States, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review