Cited by 355Body Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Effectiveness of body roundness index in predicting metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Rico‐Martín, Sergio, Calderón‐García, Julían F., Sánchez‐Rey, Purificación, Franco‐Antonio, Cristina, Martínez Alvarez, Mariana, Sánchez Muñoz‐Torrero, Juan F.·2020·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Summary: Body roundness index (BRI) is a new anthropometric index developed to predict both body fat and the percentage of visceral adipose tissue. Our aim was to investigate whether BRI is superior to traditional anthropometric indices in predicting metabolic syndrome (MetS). This systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted using Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Sciences databases. The estimated pooled areas under curve (AUCs) for BRI predicting MetS was higher than body mass index (BMI), waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR), body shape index (ABSI) and body adiposity index (BAI), similar to waist circumference (WC) and lower than waist‐to‐height ratio (WHtR). However, the difference between BRI and BMI, WC and WHtR predicting MetS was statistically non‐significant. Similar results were found with the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC‐SROC). In addition, the non‐Chinese population had pooled AUCs greater than the Chinese population for all indices. Pooled ORs showed that BRI is associated with an increased MetS risk. In conclusion, BRI had good discriminatory power for MetS in adults of both sexes from diverse populations (AUC > 0.7; AUC‐SROC>0.7). However, WC and WHtR offer the best performance when screening for MetS, and non‐significant differences were found with BRI. In contrast, BRI was superior to BMI, WHR, ABSI and BAI in predicting MetS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.13023

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rico‐Martín, S., Calderón‐García, J. F., Sánchez‐Rey, P., Franco‐Antonio, C., Martínez Alvarez, M., & Sánchez Muñoz‐Torrero, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
  • Department of Nursing, Nursing and Occupational Therapy College University of Extremadura Cáceres Spain
  • Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine University of Extremadura Badajoz Spain
  • Department of Internal Medicine Hospital Universitario de Cáceres Cáceres Spain
Corresponding author
Rico‐Martín, Sergio
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-08
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
e13023-e13023
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W3014767564
Cited by
355
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
body roundness index, metabolic syndrome, anthropometric indices, visceral adipose tissue, fat mass, body mass index, waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, body shape index, body adiposity index, metabolic syndrome screening, diagnostic accuracy
MeSH terms
Humans, Body Mass Index, Metabolic Syndrome, Adiposity, Waist Circumference, Waist-Height Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review