Cited by 27Colonialism, slavery, and tradeHistory of Colonial BrazilRace, History, and American Society

Interpretations of Slavery: The Slave Status in the Americas

Sio, Arnold A.·1965·Comparative Studies in Society and History

Abstract

Recent interpretations of slavery in the United States suggest that we may be entering a new phase of scholarship on slavery as new approaches and categories are introduced by historians, and as anthropologists and sociologists again take up the study of an institution that was of such concern to their nineteenth century predecessors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0010417500003698

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sio, A. A.
Affiliations
Colgate University (US)
Corresponding author
Sio, Arnold A.
Venue
Comparative Studies in Society and History
Published
1965-04
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
289-308
ISSN
  • 0010-4175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2999
OpenAlex
W2098615720
Cited by
27
References
38
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Studies in Society and History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › History of Colonial Brazil
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
slavery, slave status, slavery in the Americas, comparative slavery, historiography of slavery, anthropology of slavery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review