The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Mutation-selection balance in a multi-locus system is investigated theoretically, using a modification of Bulmer's infinitesimal model of selection on a normally-distributed quantitative character, taking the number of mutations per individual (n) to represent the character value. The logarithm of the fitness of an individual with n mutations is assumed to be a quadratic, decreasing function of n. The equilibrium properties of infinitely large asexual populations, random-mating populations lacking genetic recombination, and random-mating populations with arbitrary recombination frequencies are investigated. With ‘synergistic’ epistasis on the scale of log fitness, such that log fitness declines more steeply as n increases, it is shown that equilibrium mean fitness is least for asexual populations. In sexual populations, mean fitness increases with the number of chromosomes and with the map length per chromosome. With ‘diminishing returns’ epistasis, such that log fitness declines less steeply as n increases, mean fitness behaves in the opposite way. Selection on asexual variants and genes affecting the rate of genetic recombination in random-mating populations was also studied. With synergistic epistasis, zero recombination always appears to be disfavoured, but free recombination is disfavoured when the mutation rate per genome is sufficiently small, leading to evolutionary stability of maps of intermediate length. With synergistic epistasis, an asexual mutant is unlikely to invade a sexual population if the mutation rate per diploid genome greatly exceeds unity. Recombination is selectively disadvantageous when there is diminishing returns epistasis. These results are compared with the results of previous theoretical studies of this problem, and with experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to population genetics theory
Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,223
An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory
J., A., Crow, J. F., & Kimura, M. (1971) · Population (French Edition) · doi:10.2307/1529706 · Cited by 3,474
(1980) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/0047-2484(80)90077-9 · Cited by 2,243
Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution
Lande, R. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · Cited by 1,828
Sequential tests for the detection of linkage.
Morton, N. E. (1955) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1,585
Sex versus Non-Sex versus Parasite
Hamilton, W. D. (1980) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544435 · Cited by 1,368
Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction
Kondrashov, A. S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/336435a0 · Cited by 1,100
The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics.
Bulmer, M. G. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531982 · Cited by 781
The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics.
Weir, B. S., & Bulmer, M. G. (1981) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530175 · Cited by 701
Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.
Simmons, M. J., & Crow, J. F. (1977) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.11.120177.000405 · Cited by 584
Cited by
PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION
Lynch, M., Blanchard, J., Houle, D., Kibota, T., Schultz, S., Vassilieva, L., & Willis, J. (1999) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05361.x · Cited by 450
The Evolution of Genetic Architecture
Hansen, T. F. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110224 · Cited by 425
Robustness–epistasis link shapes the fitness landscape of a randomly drifting protein
Bershtein, S., Segal, M., Bekerman, R., Tokuriki, N., & Tawfik, D. S. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05385 · Cited by 414
The dominance theory of Haldane's rule.
Turelli, M., & Orr, H. A. (1995) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/140.1.389 · Cited by 373
Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal?
Turelli, M., & Barton, N. H. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/138.3.913 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlesworth, B.
- Venue
- Genetical Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1990-06
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-221
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W2170687500
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0016672300025532
- The paper
- Charlesworth, B. (1990). Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genetical Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672300025532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.