The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal?
Abstract
We develop a general population genetic framework for analyzing selection on many loci, and apply it to strong truncation and disruptive selection on an additive polygenic trait. We first present statistical methods for analyzing the infinitesimal model, in which offspring breeding values are normally distributed around the mean of the parents, with fixed variance. These show that the usual assumption of a Gaussian distribution of breeding values in the population gives remarkably accurate predictions for the mean and the variance, even when disruptive selection generates substantial deviations from normality. We then set out a general genetic analysis of selection and recombination. The population is represented by multilocus cumulants describing the distribution of haploid genotypes, and selection is described by the relation between mean fitness and these cumulants. We provide exact recursions in terms of generating functions for the effects of selection on non-central moments. The effects of recombination are simply calculated as a weighted sum over all the permutations produced by meiosis. Finally, the new cumulants that describe the next generation are computed from the non-central moments. Although this scheme is applied here in detail only to selection on an additive trait, it is quite general. For arbitrary epistasis and linkage, we describe a consistent infinitesimal limit in which the short-term selection response is dominated by infinitesimal allele frequency changes and linkage disequilibria. Numerical multilocus results show that the standard Gaussian approximation gives accurate predictions for the dynamics of the mean and genetic variance in this limit. Even with intense truncation selection, linkage disequilibria of order three and higher never cause much deviation from normality. Thus, the empirical deviations frequently found between predicted and observed responses to artificial selection are not caused by linkage-disequilibrium-induced departures from normality. Disruptive selection can generate substantial four-way disequilibria, and hence kurtosis; but even then, the Gaussian assumption predicts the variance accurately. In contrast to the apparent simplicity of the infinitesimal limit, data suggest that changes in genetic variance after 10 or more generations of selection are likely to be dominated by allele frequency dynamics that depend on genetic details.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
The measurement of selection on correlated characters
Lande, R., & Arnold, S. J. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb00236.x · Cited by 5,437
Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution
Lande, R. (1976) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00911.x · Cited by 1,828
Mathematical Population Genetics
Baake, E., Ewens, W. J., & Wakolbinger, A. (2006) · Oberwolfach Reports · doi:10.4171/owr/2005/40 · Cited by 1,624
Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes
Kauffman, S., & Levin, S. (1987) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80029-2 · Cited by 1,386
The Effect of Selection on Genetic Variability
Bulmer, M. G. (1971) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282718 · Cited by 989
REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SELECTION: STATISTICAL INFERENCE AND BIOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Mitchell‐Olds, T., & Shaw, R. G. (1987) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb02457.x · Cited by 866
The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics.
Bulmer, M. G. (1987) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531982 · Cited by 781
EVOLUTIONARY QUANTITATIVE GENETICS: HOW LITTLE DO WE KNOW?
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M. (1989) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.002005 · Cited by 686
Self-citationHeritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle
Turelli, M. (1984) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0 · Cited by 575
Self-citation
Cited by
Kirkpatrick, M., & Barton, N. H. (1997) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/286054 · Cited by 1,380
Self-citationThe genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation
Pritchard, J. K., Pickrell, J. K., & Coop, G. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055 · Cited by 932
BARTON, N. H. (1999) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s001667239900422x · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turelli, M., & Barton, N. H.
- Venue
- Genetics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 913-941
- ISSN
- 0016-6731 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2631
- OpenAlex
- W1852226811
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/genetics/138.3.913
- The paper
- Turelli, M., & Barton, N. H. (1994). Genetic and statistical analyses of strong selection on polygenic traits: what, me normal? Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/138.3.913
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.