The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Method-of-moments estimators (MMEs) for the two-gene coefficients of relationship and inbreeding, and for thxe four-gene Cotterman coefficients, are described. These estimators, which use co-dominant genetic markers, are most appropriate for estimating pairwise relatedness or individual inbreeding coefficients, as opposed to their mean values in a group. This is because, compared to the maximum likelihood estimate (MLE), they show reduced small-sample bias and lack distributional assumptions. The ‘efficient’ MME is an optimally weighted average of estimates given by each allele at each locus. Generally, weights must be computed numerically, but if true coefficients are assumed zero, simplifiedestimators are obtained whose relative efficiencies are quite high. Population gene frequency is assumed to be assayed ina larger, ‘reference population’ sample, and the biases introduced by small reference samples and/or genetic drift of the reference population are discussed. Individual-level estimates of relatedness or inbreeding, while displaying high variance, are useful in several applications as a covariate in population studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies
Kang, H. M., Sul, J. H., Service, S. K., Zaitlen, N. A., Kong, S.-Y., Freimer, N. B., Sabatti, C., & Eskin, E. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.548 · Cited by 2,817
New insights from fine‐scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations
Vekemans, X., & Hardy, O. J. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2004.02076.x · Cited by 1,313
Mosher, D. S., Quignon, P., Bustamante, C. D., Sutter, N. B., Mellersh, C. S., Parker, H. G., & Ostrander, E. A. (2007) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030079 · Cited by 826
Burgueño, J., de los Campos, G., Weigel, K., & Crossa, J. (2012) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2011.06.0299 · Cited by 601
Harnessing genomic information for livestock improvement
Georges, M., Charlier, C., & Hayes, B. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0082-2 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritland, K.
- Venue
- Genetical Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-185
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W2147464346
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0016672300033620
- The paper
- Ritland, K. (1996). Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients. Genetical Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672300033620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.