The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations
Open accessAbstract
Levels of neutral genetic diversity in populations subdivided into two demes were studied by multi-locus stochastic simulations. The model includes deleterious mutations at loci throughout the genome, causing ‘background selection’, as well as a single locus at which a polymorphism is maintained, either by frequency-dependent selection or by local selective differences. These balanced polymorphisms induce long coalescence times at linked neutral loci, so that sequence diversity at these loci is enhanced at statistical equilibrium. We study how equilibrium neutral diversity levels are affected by the degree of population subdivision, the presence or absence of background selection, and the level of inbreeding of the population. The simulation results are compared with approximate analytical formulae, assuming the infinite sites neutral model. We discuss how balancing selection can be distinguished from local selection, by determining whether peaks of diversity in the region of the polymorphic locus are seen within or between demes. The width of such diversity peaks is shown to depend on the total species population size, rather than local deme sizes. We show that, with population subdivision, local selection enhances between-deme diversity even at neutral sites distant from the polymorphic locus, producing higher FST values than with no selection; very high values can be generated at sites close to a selected locus. Background selection also increases FST, mainly because of decreased diversity within populations, which implies that its effects may be distinguishable from those of local selection. Both effects are stronger in selfing than outcrossing populations. Linkage disequilibrium between neutral sites is generated by both balancing and local selection, especially in selfing populations, because of linkage disequilibrium between the neutral sites and the selectively maintained alleles. We discuss how these theoretical results can be related to data on genetic diversity within and between local populations of a species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection
Nielsen, R. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420 · Cited by 1,641
Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST≠1/(4Nm+1)
Whitlock, M. C., & McCauley, D. E. (1999) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 · Cited by 1,544
Cruickshank, T. E., & Hahn, M. W. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12796 · Cited by 1,061
A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation
Berg, J. J., & Coop, G. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004412 · Cited by 487
Effects of inbreeding on the genetic diversity of populations
Charlesworth, D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1296 · Cited by 466
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CHARLESWORTH, B., NORDBORG, M., & CHARLESWORTH, D.
- Venue
- Genetical Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-174
- ISSN
- 0016-6723 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5073
- OpenAlex
- W2137303277
- Cited by
- 680
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0016672397002954
- The paper
- CHARLESWORTH, B., NORDBORG, M., & CHARLESWORTH, D. (1997). The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genetical Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672397002954
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.