The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resolution of the age structure of the detrital zircon populations of two Lower Cretaceous sandstones from the Weald of England by fission track dating
Open accessAbstract
Modes in the frequency of distribution of fission track ages obtained from detrital zircon grains may prove characteristic of individual sandstone bodies, supporting the identification of the sources from which a particular flow of sedimentary detritus was derived and thus allowing new inferences to be made concerning palaeogeography. A computer program has been written and used to identify modes in the zircon fission track age distribution within two Lower Cretaceous sandstone samples from the Weald of southern England. Pronounced modes appear in one rock around 119 Ma, 160 Ma, 243 Ma and 309 Ma and in the other around 141 Ma, 175 Ma, 257 to 277 Ma and 394 to 453 Ma. The geological implications of these quite dissimilar zircon age spectra are discussed. It is concluded that they support the palaeogeographical models of Allen (1981) and indicate that the provenance of the first sample, from the Top Ashdown Sandstone member at Dallington in East Sussex, was almost entirely southerly, while that of the second, from the Netherside Sand member at Northchapel in West Sussex, was more varied, but predominantly westerly and northerly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution
Misof, B., Liu, S., Meusemann, K., Peters, R. S., Donath, A., Mayer, C., Frandsen, P. B., Ware, J., Flouri, T., Beutel, R. G., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1257570 · Cited by 2,694
On the visualisation of detrital age distributions
Vermeesch, P. (2012) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.04.021 · Cited by 1,530
Galbraith, R. F., & Roberts, R. G. (2012) · Quaternary Geochronology · doi:10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.020 · Cited by 731
Estimating the component ages in a finite mixture
Galbraith, R. F., & Green, P. F. (1990) · International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements · doi:10.1016/1359-0189(90)90035-v · Cited by 572
Graphical Display of Estimates Having Differing Standard Errors
Galbraith, R. F. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488400 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurford, A. J., Fitch, F. J., & Clarke, A.
- Venue
- Geological Magazine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 269-277
- ISSN
- 0016-7568 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5081
- OpenAlex
- W1969992119
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resolution of the age structure of the detrital zircon populations of two Lower Cretaceous sandstones from the Weald of England by fission track dating. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0016756800029162
- The paper
- Hurford, A. J., Fitch, F. J., & Clarke, A. (1984). Resolution of the age structure of the detrital zircon populations of two Lower Cretaceous sandstones from the Weald of England by fission track dating. Geological Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016756800029162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.