The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Banning chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone
Abstract
The emergence of scientific evidence that emissions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were depleting the stratospheric ozone layer prompted an epistemic community of atmospheric scientists and concerned policymakers to push for regulations regarding CFC use. Members of the transnational epistemic community played a primary role in gathering information, disseminating it to governments and CFC manufacturers, and helping them formulate international, domestic, and industry policies regarding CFC consumption and production. Community members contributed to the timing and stringency of CFC regulations through a combination of strategies ranging from the persuasion of individuals to the capture of various decision-making channels. Most important, by influencing the actions of the United States and DuPont, the largest producer of CFCs, the epistemic community changed the external environment in which policy decisions were made by other governments and firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone
Molina, M. J., & Rowland, F. S. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/249810a0 · Cited by 4,332
Cited by
Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications
Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 · Cited by 1,346
Multilateralism: the anatomy of an institution
Ruggie, J. G. (1992) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818300027831 · Cited by 1,163
COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives
Weible, C. M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P., Carter, D. P., Anderson, D., Durnová, A. P., Heikkila, T., Ingold, K., McConnell, A., & Stone, D. (2020) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4 · Cited by 602
Héritier, A. (1996) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501769608407026 · Cited by 342
Climate change and knowledge politics
Grundmann, R. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701251656 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Haas, P. M.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-224
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2104933021
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Banning chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002081830000148x
- The paper
- Haas, P. M. (1992). Banning chlorofluorocarbons: epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002081830000148x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.