Cited by 255Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Sustainable Development

Climate change and knowledge politics

Grundmann, Reiner·2007·Environmental Politics

Abstract

This paper addresses the paradox that although the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has reached a broad consensus, various governments pursue different, if not opposing policies. This puzzle not only challenges the traditional belief that scientific knowledge is objective and can be more or less directly translated into political action, but also calls for a better understanding of the relation between science and public policy in modern society. Based on the conceptual framework of knowledge politics the use of expert knowledge in public discourse and in political decisions will be analysed. This will be carried out through a country comparison between the United States and Germany. The main finding is that the press in both countries relies on different sources of scientific expertise when reporting on global warming. In a similar way, governments in both countries use these different sources for legitimising their contrasting policies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09644010701251656

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grundmann, R.
Affiliations
Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Grundmann, Reiner
Venue
Environmental Politics
Published
2007-05-14
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
414-432
ISSN
  • 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8934
OpenAlex
W2014675463
Cited by
255
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
FWCI
33.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
Keywords
climate change, politics of knowledge, IPCC, science-policy interface, expert knowledge, media coverage of science, climate policy, United States, Germany, policy legitimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review