The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo
Abstract
How is it, that among the countless technological innovations in weaponry, chemical weapons stand out as weapons that carry the stigma of moral illegitimacy. To provide an adequate account of the prohibitionary norm against chemical weapons use, one must understand the meanings that have served to constitute and delegitimize this category of weapons. Such an account is provided by genealogy, a method that examines the interpretive practices around which moral orders are constructed and behaviors are defined as normal or unacceptable. The genealogical method yields insights that illuminate neglected dimensions of the chemical weapons taboo: namely, the roles that contingency, domination, and resistance have played in the operation of this norm as a symbol of “uncivilized” conduct in international relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bull, H. (2012) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-39340-0 · Cited by 3,316
Bull, H. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9 · Cited by 3,316
Cited by
Social Theory of International Politics
Wendt, A. (1999) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511612183 · Cited by 7,664
Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics
ADLER, E. (1997) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/1354066197003003003 · Cited by 1,446
The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use
Tannenwald, N. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899550959 · Cited by 782
Metadata
- Authors
- Price, R.
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 73-103
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W2047232330
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0020818300001582
- The paper
- Price, R. (1995). A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo. International Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300001582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
