From Shocks to Waves: Hegemonic Transitions and Democratization in the Twentieth Century
Open accessAbstract
What causes democratic waves? This article puts forward a theory of institutional waves that focuses on the effects of systemic transformations. It argues that abrupt shifts in the distribution of power among leading states create unique and powerful incentives for sweeping domestic reforms. A variety of statistical tests reveals strong support for the idea that shifts in hegemonic power have shaped waves of democracy, fascism, and communism in the twentieth century, independent of domestic factors or horizontal diffusion. These “hegemonic shocks” produce windows of opportunity for external regime imposition, enable rising powers to rapidly expand networks of trade and patronage, and inspire imitators by credibly revealing hidden information about relative regime effectiveness to foreign audiences. I outline these mechanisms of coercion, influence, and emulation that connect shocks to waves, empirically test their relationship, and illustrate the theory with two case studies—the wave of democratic transitions after World War I, and the fascist wave of the late interwar period. In sum, democracy in the twentieth century cannot be fully understood without examining the effects of hegemonic shocks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sequential pattern of coups across the Sahel from 2020 to 2023 is consistent with contagion dynamics: each successful intervention reduced the perceived costs and increased the perceived legitimacy of subsequent ones.
“The sequential pattern of coups across the Sahel from 2020 to 2023 is consistent with contagion dynamics: each successful intervention reduced the perceived costs and increased the perceived legitimacy of subsequent ones.”
From State Collapse, Democratic Dysfunction, and the Rise of Military Intervention in West Africa: A Study of Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Guinea (2026) · cites this paper as Gunitsky, 2014
Cites
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014 · Cited by 6,223 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Brambor, Clark, and Golder 2006.”
Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511781353 · Cited by 3,459 · see citing works
The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century
Berman, S. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791109 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980-2000
Johnston, A. I. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400852987 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ofodile, C. N. (2026) · International journal of research and innovation in social science · doi:10.47772/ijriss.2026.100600328
- Authors
- Gunitsky, S.
- Corresponding author
- Gunitsky, Seva
- ORCID
- Gunitsky, Seva
- Venue
- International Organization
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 561-597
- ISSN
- 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5088
- OpenAlex
- W3125056977
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Organization (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- hegemonic transition, systemic change, communism, democratic transition, interwar period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review