CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Gender, Security, and ConflictPolitical Conflict and GovernanceGender Politics and Representation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conflict, Peace, and the Evolution of Women's Empowerment

Webster, Kaitlyn, Chen, Chong, Beardsley, Kyle·2019·International Organization
DOI 10.1017/s0020818319000055
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract How do periods of conflict and peace shape women's empowerment around the world? While existing studies have demonstrated that gender inequalities contribute to the propensity for armed conflict, we consider how the anticipation and realization of armed conflict shape women's opportunities for influence in society. Some scholars have pointed to the role that militarization and threat play in entrenching male dominance, while others have argued that periods of warfare can upend existing gender hierarchical orders. We posit mechanisms by which the preparation for and experiences during war affect change in women's empowerment. We develop and test observable implications using cross-national data from 1900 to 2015. We find that, at least in the short and medium term, warfare can disrupt social institutions and lead to an increase in women's empowerment via mechanisms related to role shifts across society and political shifts catalyzed by war. Reforming institutions and mainstreaming gender during peace processes stand to have important legacies for gender power relations in postconflict societies, though much more may be needed for more permanent change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0020818319000055

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Flaherty, 2015, Gender and Peacebuilding: All Hands Required, 53
  2. Omeje, 2009, War to Peace Transition, 99
  3. 2009, This Child Will Be Great
  4. 2008, A Situation Analysis of the Women Survivors of the 1989–2003 Armed Conflict in Liberia
  5. Tir, 2013, The Journal of Politics, 76, 27
  6. Che, 2015, Gender, Peace and Security: Implementing UN Security Council Resolution 1325, 116
  7. 2015, Women and Power in Post-Conflict Africa
  8. 2001, Culture, and Society, 15, 161
  9. Sjoberg, 2010, Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives, 17
  10. Bremer, 1972, Peace, War, and Numbers, 19
  11. 1999, Latin American Perspectives, 26, 85

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Webster, K., Chen, C., & Beardsley, K.
ORCID
Venue
International Organization
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2019
Volume
73
Issue
02
Pages
255-289
ISSN
  • 0020-8183 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5088
DOI
10.1017/s0020818319000055
OpenAlex
W2924051944
Cited by
121
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 84 d)
Locations
  • International Organization (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Security, and Conflict
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
Keywords
women's empowerment, armed conflict, peace process, gender inequality, militarization, male dominance, gender hierarchy, institutional disruption, post-conflict societies, gender mainstreaming, gender and power, gender and war

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review