The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate
Abstract
SUMMARY: In a field experiment on the effects of drought on spring barley the crop was protected from rain by automatic rain shelters. Various plots received irrigation at different times to give a range of drought treatments from full irrigation to no irrigation between emergence and harvest. The foliage area, light interception, stomatal resistance and leaf photosynthesis rate of five treatments were measured throughout the growing season, and a mathematical model has related the computed whole canopy photosynthesis to the measured total dry-matter yields at harvest. Hence, it was possible to estimate tha independent influences of drought on radiation interception, efficiency of use of intercepted radiation, and respiration. The analysis shows that for all treatments the decrease of intercepted radiation was the major factor in reducing yield, and it accounted for a loss of 30–40% for treatments that were stressed from the beginning of the season, and of 10–20% for treatments that were stressed after mid-May. Stomatal closure caused a reduction of up to 11% in daily photosynthesis, and the maximum effect was on plants that acquired a large leaf area before being stressed. However, the effect of stomatal closure integrated over the whole season was only 6% or less. Our measurements of internal resistance to carbon dioxide transfer were not precise enough to show significant differences between treatments; but increases of internal resistance, caused by stress, may have contributed to loss of yield.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484 · cited 1×
“Such non-linearity in the relationship between yield and intercepted radiation can be due to the non-linear response of individual leaf photosynthesis to irradiance, or due to other factors that change leaf photosynthesis or respiration (Monteith, 1977).”
Background
Cited by
Lawlor, D. W., & Tezara, W. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn244 · Cited by 852
Self-citationA General Model for the Light-Use Efficiency of Primary Production
Haxeltine, A., & Prentice, I. C. (1996) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.2307/2390165 · Cited by 441
Climatic variation and the growth of crops
Monteith, J. L. (1981) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49710745402 · Cited by 334
Physiological basis of wood production: A review
Cannell, M. G. R. (1989) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827588909382582 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Legg, B. J., Day, W., Lawlor, D. W., & Parkinson, K. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1979-06
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 703-716
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2124336408
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0021859600053958
- The paper
- Legg, B. J., Day, W., Lawlor, D. W., & Parkinson, K. J. (1979). The effects of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. The Journal of Agricultural Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600053958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.