The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiological basis of wood production: A review
Abstract
The theoretical background to wood production is outlined and the factual background is given by reviewing measured rates of wood production. It is recommended that differences in wood production be analysed, not by statistical methods, traditional growth analysis or by comprehensive models, but by using a ‘light use analysis’, where wood production is determined by (1) the amount of light intercepted by the canopy, (2) the light use efficiency, net of respiration, (3) the proportion of assimilates partitioned to wood, and (4) mortality losses. These four components are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harper, J. L. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 9,128
Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain
Monteith, J. L. (1977) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · Cited by 3,484
Larcher, W. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-96545-6 · Cited by 3,038
Solar Radiation and Productivity in Tropical Ecosystems
Monteith, J. L. (1972) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2401901 · Cited by 2,724
The Physiological Ecology of Plant Succession
Bazzaz, F. A. (1979) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.10.110179.002031 · Cited by 1,310
Litter Production in Forests of the World
Bray, J. R., & Gorham, E. (1964) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60331-1 · Cited by 1,019
Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis a quantitative approach
De Vries, F. W. T. P., Brunsting, A. H. M., & Van Laar, H. H. (1974) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(74)90119-2 · Cited by 914
Evans, G. (1976) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(76)90058-6 · Cited by 823
Photosynthesis of leaf canopies
de Wit, C. T. (1965) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 784
Water stress, growth and osmotic adjustment
Hsiao, T. C., Acevedo, E., Fereres, E., & Henderson, D. W. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0026 · Cited by 687
Cited by
Hyvönen, R., Ågren, G. I., Linder, S., Persson, T., Cotrufo, M. F., Ekblad, A., Freeman, M., Grelle, A., Janssens, I. A., Jarvis, P. G., et al. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.01967.x · Cited by 688
Kauter, D., Lewandowski, I., & Claupein, W. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00177-0 · Cited by 237
Gilland, K. E., & McCarthy, B. C. (2012) · Northern Journal of Applied Forestry · doi:10.5849/njaf.11-041 · Cited by 12
Shibu, M. E., Matthews, R. B., Bakam, I., Moffat, A. J., & Baggaley, N. J. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.039 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannell, M. G. R.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 459-490
- ISSN
- 0282-7581 (ISSN-L)
- 1651-1891
- OpenAlex
- W2038982919
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological basis of wood production: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02827588909382582
- The paper
- Cannell, M. G. R. (1989). Physiological basis of wood production: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827588909382582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
