Life-cycle assessment of biogas production under the environmental conditions of northern Germany: greenhouse gas balance
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY A considerable expansion of biogas production in Germany, paralleled by a strong increase in maize acreage, has caused growing concern that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during crop substrate production might counteract the GHG emission saving potential. Based on a 2-year field trial, a GHG balance was conducted to evaluate the mitigation potential of regionally adapted cropping systems (continuous maize, maize-wheat-Italian ryegrass, perennial ryegrass ley), depending on nitrogen (N) level and N type. Considering the whole production chain, all cropping systems investigated contributed to the mitigation of GHG emissions (6·7–13·3 t CO2 eq/ha), with continuous maize revealing a carbon dioxide (CO2) saving potential of 55–61% compared with a fossil energy mix reference system. The current sustainability thresholds in terms of CO2 savings set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive could be met by all cropping systems (48–76%). Emissions from crop production had the largest impact on the mitigation effect (⩾50%) unless the biogas residue storage was not covered. The comparison of N fertilizer types showed less pronounced differences in GHG mitigation potential, whereas considerable site effects were observed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-appropriate procedures before bioenergy plantation can lead to negative consequences like increased soil erosion and compaction risks, increased nitrogen mineralization and leaching risks, and changes in local biodiversity.
“non-appropriate procedures can lead to many negative consequences like increased soil erosion and compaction risks (Duttmann et al., 2014), increased nitrogen mineralization and leaching risks (Claus et al., 2014;Svoboda et al., 2013), and changes in local bio-diversity (Brandt and Glemnitz, 2014;Csikós and Szilassi, 2020).”
From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Claus et al., 2014
Cites
Cherubini, F., Bird, N., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B., & Woess-Gallasch, S. (2009) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013 · Cited by 988 · see citing works
Šimek, P., & Cooper, J. E. (2002) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2002.00461.x · Cited by 805 · see citing works
Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways
Poeschl, M., Ward, S. M., & Owende, P. M. O. (2010) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF NET GREENHOUSE-GAS FLUX FOR BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS
Adler, P. R., Grosso, S. J. D., & Parton, W. J. (2007) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/05-2018 · Cited by 652 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…oxide emissions Since direct N2O emissions from managed soils due to fertilization and denitrification play an important role in GHG balancing (Adler et al. 2007; MeyerAurich et al. 2012), corresponding emissions were measured in the field trial (Senbayram 2009) and considered in the analysis.”
MethodDobbie, K. E., & Smith, K. A. (2001) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.00395.x · Cited by 359 · see citing works
A method of energy balancing in crop production and its application in a long-term fertilizer trial
Hülsbergen, K., Feil, B., Biermann, S., Rathke, G.-W., Kalk, W., & Diepenbrock, W. (2001) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00286-3 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Soil CN ratio as a scalar parameter to predict nitrous oxide emissions
Klemedtsson, L., von Arnold, K., Weslien, P., & Gundersen, P. (2005) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00973.x · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions
Börjesson, P., & Berglund, M. (2006) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.014 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Jury, C., Benetto, E., Köster, D., Schmitt, B., & Welfring, J. (2009) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.09.011 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion
Gerin, P. A., Vliegen, F., & Jossart, J.-M. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.049 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Felten, D., Fröba, N., Fries, J., & Emmerling, C. (2013) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.004 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Meyer‐Aurich, A., Schattauer, A., Hellebrand, H. J., Klauss, H., Plöchl, M., & Berg, W. E. (2011) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.030 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Düngemittel — Energie- und Stoffstrombilanzen
Patyk, A., & Reinhardt, G. A. (1997) · Vieweg+Teubner eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-663-08014-5 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Sieling, K., Herrmann, A., Wienforth, B., Taube, F., Ohl, S., Hartung, E., & Kage, H. (2013) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.01.002 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationEdelmann, W., Baier, U., & Engeli, H. (2005) · Water Science & Technology · doi:10.2166/wst.2005.0518 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in agriculture
Bachmaier, J., Effenberger, M., & Gronauer, A. (2010) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201000073 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Crop production for biogas and water protection—A trade-off?
Svoboda, N., Taube, F., Kluß, C., Wienforth, B., Kage, H., Ohl, S., Hartung, E., & Herrmann, A. (2013) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.024 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationSPN: A model for the study of soil-plant nitrogen fluxes in silage maize cultivation
Bleken, M. A., Herrmann, A., Haugen, L. E., Taube, F., & Bakken, L. R. (2009) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/j.eja.2009.01.001 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationGreenhouse gas emissions in biogas production systems
Dittert, K., Şenbayram, M., Wienforth, B., Kage, H., & Mühling, K. H. (2009) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationAhlgrimm, H.-J., Böhme, H., Bramm, A., et al. (2000) · OpenAgrar · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review
Csikós, N., & Tóth, G. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103560 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Csikos, N., Schwanebeck, M., Kuhwald, M., Szilassi, P., & Duttmann, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11092500 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- CLAUS, S., TAUBE, F., WIENFORTH, B., SVOBODA, N., SIELING, K., KAGE, H., SENBAYRAM, M., DITTERT, K., GERICKE, D., PACHOLSKI, A., & HERRMANN, A.
- Affiliations
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (DE)
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- CLAUS, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-11
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 172-181
- ISSN
- 0021-8596 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-5146
- OpenAlex
- W2001705974
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- The Journal of Agricultural Science (publishedVersion)
- GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- GRO (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
- Keywords
- biogas production, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, maize, continuous maize, nitrogen fertilization, nitrogen fertilizer type, carbon emission reduction, northern Germany, life cycle assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review