Cited by 76Health and Conflict StudiesMigration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

MENTAL HEALTH AND COPING IN A WAR SITUATION: THE CASE OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

CARBALLO, MANUEL, SMAJKIC, ARIF, ZERIC, DAMIR, DZIDOWSKA, MONIKA, GEBRE-MEDHIN, JOY, VAN HALEM, JOOST·2004·Journal of Biosocial Science

Abstract

The latter part of the twentieth century has seen an increased concern for the implications of war for civilian populations, and more attention has been given to psychosocial impacts of uprooting and displacement. ‘Loss of place’, acute and chronic trauma, family disruption and problems of family reunification have become issues of concern. The war in Bosnia was characterized by massive displacement, disruption and loss of life, relatives and property. Health and psychosocial well-being were affected in a number of ways. There was an overwhelming loss of perceived power and self-esteem. Over 25% of displaced people, for example, said they no longer felt they were able to play a useful role; even in non-displaced populations approximately 11% of those interviewed said that they had lost a sense of worth. Widespread depression and feelings of fatigue and listlessness were common and may have prevented people from taking steps to improve their situation. Almost a quarter of internally displaced people had a high startle capacity and said they were constantly nervous. Most adverse psychosocial responses increased with age and in a population that includes many elderly people this poses serious problems. The findings point to major challenges with respect to repatriation and reconstruction. They highlight the importance of family reunification and the facilitating of decision-making by affected people themselves. The findings also shed light on potential problems associated with over-dependence on external assistance and hence the need for people to be given the means of using their skills and knowledge to control their day-to-day lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0021932004006753

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CARBALLO, M., SMAJKIC, A., ZERIC, D., DZIDOWSKA, M., GEBRE-MEDHIN, J., & VAN HALEM, J.
Venue
Journal of Biosocial Science
Published
2004-06-23
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
463-477
ISSN
  • 0021-9320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7599
OpenAlex
W1999545873
Cited by
76
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biosocial Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
mental health, coping, war, Bosnian War, internally displaced persons, psychosocial impact, loss of place, trauma, family breakdown, family reunification, self-esteem, depression, startle response, older adults, repatriation, Reconstruction, self-determination
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Altruism, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Life Change Events, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Refugees, Stress, Psychological, Warfare, Bosnia and Herzegovina

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review