Cited by 987Health and Conflict StudiesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and Trauma

A critique of seven assumptions behind psychological trauma programmes in war-affected areas

Summerfield, Derek·1999·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Programmes costing millions of dollars to address 'posttraumatic stress' in war zones have been increasingly prominent in humanitarian aid operations, backed by UNICEF, WHO, European Community Humanitarian Office and many nongovernmental organisations. The assumptions underpinning this work, which this paper critiques with particular reference to Bosnia and Rwanda, reflect a globalisation of Western cultural trends towards the medicalisation of distress and the rise of psychological therapies. This paper argues that for the vast majority of survivors posttraumatic stress is a pseudocondition, a reframing of the understandable suffering of war as a technical problem to which short-term technical solutions like counselling are applicable. These concepts aggrandise the Western agencies and their 'experts' who from afar define the condition and bring the cure. There is no evidence that war-affected populations are seeking these imported approaches, which appear to ignore their own traditions, meaning systems, and active priorities. One basic question in humanitarian operations is: whose knowledge is privileged and who has the power to define the problem? What is fundamental is the role of a social world, invariably targeted in today's 'total' war and yet still embodying the collective capacity of survivor populations to mourn, endure and rebuild.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00450-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Summerfield, D.
Corresponding author
Summerfield, Derek
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1449-1462
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082317339
Cited by
987
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 43
FWCI
54.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
UNICEF
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, war-affected populations, humanitarian aid, psychotherapy, Western cultural imperialism, Bosnia, Rwanda, mourning, collective resilience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Altruism, Child, Counseling, Data Collection, Europe, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United Nations, Warfare, World Health Organization, Program Evaluation, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review