Cited by 24Infant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Bacillus bifidus: its Characters and Isolation from the Intestine of Infants.

Open access
Cruickshank, Robert·1925·Epidemiology and Infection

Abstract

1.B. bifidus communis, first isolated and described by Tissier, is the predominant organism in the intestinal flora of healthy breast-fed infants in the early weeks of life. In films of the faeces at this period Gram-positive bacilli may constitute almost 99 per cent. of the organisms present. 2.B. bifidus requires fairly strict anaerobic conditions for its isolation in primary culture; but thereafter it grows readily in sub-cultures in the presence of oxygen. 3.B. bifidus is a member of the acid-tolerant group of Gram-positive, faecal organisms. Although closely resembling B. acidophilus, it is distinct from the latter morphologically and also in certain of its cultural characters. The results of agglutination reactions indicate that different strains of B. bifidus are not serologically uniform. 4. Although B. bifidus is a very pleomorphic organism, no evidence was obtained in the present work that it could be changed into an aerobic, spore-bearing bacillus. 5. The predominance of B. bifidus in the intestinal flora of breast-fed infants appears to be closely related to the high degree of acidity of the faeces of these infants. It is probable that the predominance of B. bifidus over other organisms is an important factor in preserving a healthy condition of the intestinal tract in the breast-fed infant.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022172400008718

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been a rich history of research into human-associated microbes since at least the late 19th century.

    “Indeed, there has been a rich history of research into human-associated microbes since at least the late 19 th century.”

    From Human microbiome myths and misconceptions (2023) · cites this paper as [2]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. MORRIS, PORTER and MEYER (1919). Journ. Infect. Dis. xxv. 349. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022172400008718 Published online by Cambridge University Press (25) NOGUCHI (1911). Journ. Exper. Med. xn. 182. \

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cruickshank, R.
Affiliations
Western Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Cruickshank, Robert
Venue
Epidemiology and Infection
Published
1925-12
Volume
24
Issue
3-4
Pages
241-254
ISSN
  • 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-4409
OpenAlex
W2074367478
Cited by
24
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epidemiology and Infection (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
breast-fed infants, anaerobic growth, Gram-positive bacilli, serological variation, bacterial morphology, gut health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review