Cited by 456Politics and Society in Latin AmericaIndigenous Studies in Latin AmericaLatin American Cultural Politics

Indigenous inclusion/black exclusion: race, ethnicity and multicultural citizenship in latin america

HOOKER, JULIET·2005·Journal of Latin American Studies

Abstract

This article analyses the causes of the disparity in collective rights gained by indigenous and Afro-Latin groups in recent rounds of multicultural citizenship reform in Latin America. Instead of attributing the greater success of indians in winning collective rights to differences in population size, higher levels of indigenous group identity or higher levels of organisation of the indigenous movement, it is argued that the main cause of the disparity is the fact that collective rights are adjudicated on the basis of possessing a distinct group identity defined in cultural or ethnic terms. Indians are generally better positioned than most Afro-Latinos to claim ethnic group identities separate from the national culture and have therefore been more successful in winning collective rights. It is suggested that one of the potentially negative consequences of basing group rights on the assertion of cultural difference is that it might lead indigenous groups and Afro-Latinos to privilege issues of cultural recognition over questions of racial discrimination as bases for political mobilisation in the era of multicultural politics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022216x05009016

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOOKER, J.
Venue
Journal of Latin American Studies
Published
2005-05
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
285-310
ISSN
  • 0022-216X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-767X
OpenAlex
W2102734499
Cited by
456
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
43.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Latin American Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
Keywords
multicultural citizenship, indigenous rights, Afro-Latinos, ethnic identity, racial discrimination, collective rights, cultural recognition, indigenous movements, political mobilization, multiculturalism, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review