Cited by 27Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

Phylogenetic analysis of some basal early Cambrian trilobites, the biogeographic origins of the Eutrilobita, and the timing of the Cambrian radiation

LIEBERMAN, BRUCE S.·2002·Journal of Paleontology

Abstract

This paper presents a phylogenetic analysis of the “Fallotaspidoidea,” a determination of the biogeographic origins of the eutrilobites, and an evaluation of the timing of the Cambrian radiation based on biogeographic evidence. Phylogenetic analysis incorporated 29 exoskeletal characters and 16 ingroup taxa. In the single most parsimonious tree the genusFallotaspidellaRepina, 1961, is the sister taxon of the sutured members of the Redlichiina Richter, 1932. Phylogenetic analysis is also used to determine the evolutionary relationships of two new species of “fallotaspidoids” distributed in the White-Inyo Range of California that have been previously illustrated but not described. These species had been referred toFallotaspisHupé, 1953, and used to define the occurrence of the eponymousFallotaspisZone in southwestern Laurentia. However, these two new species need to be reassigned toArchaeaspisRepinainKhomentovskii and Repina, 1965. They are described asArchaeaspis nelsoniandA. macropleuron.Their phylogenetic status suggests that theFallotaspisZone in southwestern Laurentia is not exactly analogous to theFallotaspisZone in Morocco, where that division was originally defined. Thus, changes to the biostratigraphy of the Early Cambrian of southwestern Laurentia may be in order. Furthermore, specimens of a new species referable toNevadiaWalcott, 1910, are recognized in strata traditionally treated as within theFallotaspisZone, which is held to underlie theNevadellaZone, suggesting further biostratigraphic complexity within the basal Lower Cambrian of southwestern Laurentia. Phylogenetic analyses of the Olenellina and Olenelloidea, along with the phylogenetic analysis presented here, are used to consider the biogeographic origins of the eutrilobites. The group appears to have originated in Siberia. Biogeographic patterns in trilobites, especially those relating to the split between the Olenellid and Redlichiid faunal provinces are important for determining the timing of the Cambrian radiation. Some authors have argued that there was a hidden radiation that significantly predated the Cambrian, whereas others have suggested that the radiation occurred right at the start of the Cambrian. The results from trilobite biogeography presented here support an early radiation. They are most compatible with the notion that there was a vicariance event relating to the origin of the redlichiinid trilobites, and thus the eponymous Redlichiid faunal province, from the “fallotaspidoids,” whose representatives were part of the Olenellid faunal province. This vicariance event, based on biogeographic patterns, is likely related to the breakup of Pannotia which occurred sometime between 600–550 Ma, suggesting that the initial episodes of trilobite cladogenesis occurred within that interval. As trilobites are relatively derived arthropods, this suggests that Númerous important episodes of metazoan cladogenesis precede both the earliest trilobitic part of the Early Cambrian, and indeed, even the Early Cambrian.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1666/0022-3360(2002)076<0692:paosbe>2.0.co;2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first occurrences of trilobites in the world post-date or are estimated to be no earlier than those on the Siberian Platform, where their first undoubted appearance is just above the base of the Atdabanian Stage.

    “The first occurrences of trilobites in the world (highlighted by thick horizontal lines within Stage 3 interval in Fig. 3) post-date or are estimated to be no earlier than those on the Siberian Platform, where their first undoubted appearance is just above the base of the Atdabanian Stage”

    From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Lieberman, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LIEBERMAN, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
LIEBERMAN, BRUCE S.
Venue
Journal of Paleontology
Published
2002
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
692
ISSN
0022-3360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4256361280
Cited by
27
References
3
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Paleontology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
trilobites, Cambrian explosion, biogeographic origin, biostratigraphy, Lower Cambrian, Laurentia, Siberia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review