Cited by 342Evolution and Paleontology StudiesMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Origin of the metazoan phyla: Molecular clocks confirm paleontological estimates

Open access
Ayala, Francisco José, Rzhetsky, Andrey, Ayala, Francisco J.·1998·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The time of origin of the animal phyla is controversial. Abundant fossils from the major animal phyla are found in the Cambrian, starting 544 million years ago. Many paleontologists hold that these phyla originated in the late Neoproterozoic, during the 160 million years preceding the Cambrian fossil explosion. We have analyzed 18 protein-coding gene loci and estimated that protostomes (arthropods, annelids, and mollusks) diverged from deuterostomes (echinoderms and chordates) about 670 million years ago, and chordates from echinoderms about 600 million years ago. Both estimates are consistent with paleontological estimates. A published analysis of seven gene loci that concludes that the corresponding divergence times are 1,200 and 1,000 million years ago is shown to be flawed because it extrapolates from slow-evolving vertebrate rates to faster-evolving invertebrate rates, as well as in other ways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.95.2.606

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Molecular clock estimates mostly place the latest PDA much deeper in time than the latest Neoproterozoic, with dates ranging from 600 to 1200 Mya depending on proteins, calibration points, and substitution models.

    “Depending on the proteins, calibration points and rate substitution models used, these estimates range from 600 to 1200 Mya (Wray et al., 1996;Ayala et al., 1998;Bromham et al., 1998;Gu, 1998;Cutler, 2000).”

    From The last common bilaterian ancestor (2002) · cites this paper as Ayala et al., 1998

  • Bilaterians do not have a significant precambrian evolutionary history.

    “Our data suggest that, inconsistent with most molecular clock estimates but consistent with paleontological predictions (e.g., refs. 13 and 14), bilaterians do not have a significant precambrian evolutionary history.”

    From Estimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock (2004) · cites this paper as [13]

  • The method presented here is more reliable than previous molecular dating techniques.

    “The combination of a rate constancy test with high resolution of long DNA sequences (two data sets totaling over 7,000 bp), use of a wide range of taxa and fossil dates (rather than reliance on a single calibration rate), and a maximum likelihood analysis makes this method more reliable than previous molecular dating techniques (11).”
  • Molecular phylogenies based on sequence comparisons of protein domains shared by all bilaterians suggest that the time of divergence of these proteins may extend back to 600-1,200 Ma ago.

    “Molecular phylogenies based on sequence comparisons of protein domains shared by all bilaterians suggest that the time of divergence of these proteins may extend back to 600–1,200 million years (megaannuum; Ma) ago (11–16).”
  • Analyses of nuclear SSU rRNA sequences have limitations including nucleotide compositional bias, among site rate variation, and heterogeneous rates of evolution across lineages.

    “Among the limitations noted are nucleotide compositional bias, among site rate variation, and heterogeneous rates of evolution across lineages (12–16).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayala, F. J., Rzhetsky, A., & Ayala, F. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; Columbia Genome Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032; and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1998-01-20
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
606-611
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2146480768
Cited by
342
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
41.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p01gm042397-05)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 42397)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
divergence time estimation, Cambrian explosion, Neoproterozoic, protein-coding genes, molecular clock rates, invertebrate evolution, arthropods, Annelida, Mollusca, Echinodermata
MeSH terms
Animals, Fossils, Phylogeny, Proteins, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review