Cited by 44Ocular Disorders and TreatmentsVisual perception and processing mechanismsRetinal Development and Disorders

The evolution of eyes: major steps. The Keeler lecture 2017: centenary of Keeler Ltd

Open access
Schwab, I R·2018·Eye

Abstract

Ocular evolution is an immense topic, and I do not expect to cover all the details of this process in this manuscript. I will present some concepts about some of the major steps in the evolutionary process to stimulate your thinking about this interesting and complex topic. In the prebiotic soup, vision was not inevitable. Eyes were not preordained. Nor were their shapes, sizes, or current physiology. Sight is an evolutionary gift but it was not ineluctable. The existence of eyes is so basic to our profession that we often do not consider how and why vision appeared or evolved on earth at all. Although vision is a principal sensory modality for at least three major phyla and is present in three or four more phyla, there are other sensory mechanisms that could have been and were occasionally selected instead. Some animals rely on other sensory mechanisms such as audition, echolocation, or olfaction that are much more effective in their particular niche than would be vision. We may not believe those sensory mechanisms to be as robust as vision, but the creatures using those skills would argue otherwise. Why does vision exist at all? And why is it so dominant at least in the number of species that rely upon it for their principal sensory mechanism? How did vision begin? What were the important steps in the evolution of eyes? How did eyes differentiate along their various paths, and why?

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/eye.2017.226

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lens development coincided with an increase in eye size.

    “This also aligns with proposed explanations that suggest that lens development coincided with an increase in eye size (59, 60).”

    From What if eye...? Computationally recreating vision evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Devonian section describes fish eyes as relatively large for body size and having large lenses. The Formation of an eye section says lenses appeared later in eye evolution, but neither passage says eye size increased when lenses developed. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Early visual systems faced a fundamental trade-off between light collection and acuity, progressing from simple light-sensitive patches to cup-shaped eyes with smaller apertures.

    “Early visual systems faced a fundamental trade-off between light collection and acuity, progressing from simple light-sensitive patches to cup-shaped eyes with smaller apertures (59, 60).”

    From What if eye...? Computationally recreating vision evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [59]

    The “Formation of an eye” section (page not provided) describes a progression from light-sensitive eyespots to concave cups that provide spatial information, then to cups whose sides form a pinhole. It does not describe a trade-off between light collection and acuity or explicitly link smaller apertures to that trade-off. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Land MF, Nilsson DE. Animal Eyes. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp 56-57.
  2. Schwab IR. Evolution's Witness: How Eyes Evolved. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp 50-62.
  3. Land MF, Nilsson DE. Animal Eyes. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp 125-177.
  4. Schwab IR. Evolution's Witness: How Eyes Evolved. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp 70-72.
  5. Land MF, Nilsson DE. Animal Eyes. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002, pp 130-135.
  6. Schwab IR. Evolution's Witness: How Eyes Evolved. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp 249-252.
  7. Schwab IR. Evolution's Witness: How Eyes Evolved. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp 85-108.
  8. Schwab IR. Evolution's Witness: How Eyes Evolved. Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012, pp 115-117.
  9. Arrese CA, Hart N, Beazley LD, Shand J. Trichromacy in marsupials. Curr Biol 2002; 12: 657-660.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwab, I. R.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Schwab, I R
Venue
Eye
Published
2017-10-20
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
302-313
ISSN
  • 0078-5334 (ISSN-L)
  • 0950-222X
  • 1476-5454
OpenAlex
W2766779061
Cited by
44
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eye (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Ocular Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
eye evolution, evolution of vision, sensory modalities, echolocation, olfaction, auditions
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Eye, Eye Proteins, Vision, Ocular, Evolution, Molecular, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review