Protecting mammal diversity: opportunities and constraints for pragmatic conservation management in Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam
Open accessAbstract
A case study is given of a conservation management planning exercise underway in Cat Tien National Park and its surrounding areas in southern Vietnam. The importance of reliable information in this process is demonstrated using the Park's mammalian diversity. Opportunities and constraints to engage the local communities in conservation management planning and implementation are reviewed. The spatial element in protected area management planning is stressed; in some areas strict preservation management regimes are needed to conserve critical biodiversity values while in other areas conservation benefits could be gained from engaging local communities in resource management. Pragmatic conservation management planning decisions address identified threats, to be resolved by re-demarcation of boundaries, resettlement of people, and community-based conservation initiatives. These should result in a more viable Park as well as provide more secure livelihood conditions for the people elsewhere. This case study is put in the context of the wider conservation management debate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of B. gaurus in Vietnam are confined to Cat Tien National Park.
“The majority of B. gaurus in Vietnam are confined to Cat Tien National Park (Polet and Ling 2004;Nguyen 2009).”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Polet and Ling 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
Ahrestani, F. S. (2018) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sey004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polet, G., & Ling, S.
- Affiliations
- Cat Tien National Park (VN)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Oryx
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-196
- ISSN
- 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3008
- OpenAlex
- W2136687990
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Oryx (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
- Keywords
- Cat Tien National Park, mammal diversity, conservation management planning, protected area management, community-based conservation, local community engagement, resettlement, livelihoods, biodiversity conservation, spatial planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review