Cited by 24Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

The status of Vulnerable gaur Bos gaurus and Endangered banteng Bos javanicus in Ea So Nature Reserve and Yok Don and Cat Tien National Parks, Vietnam

Open access
Nguyen, Manh Ha·2009·Oryx

Abstract

Abstract The wild buffaloes, gaur Bos gaurus and banteng Bos javanicus, are among the most threatened mammals in Vietnam but little information is available on their status and distribution. Over 2004–2007 I undertook surveys in three Vietnamese distribution strongholds of the Vulnerable gaur and Endangered banteng: Ea So Nature Reserve and Yok Don and Cat Tien National Parks. A total of 22 herds with 121 gaur and seven herds with 49 banteng were observed. Herd sizes of both species were generally lower than those recorded in Thailand and Malaysia. Most of the herds were observed in remote areas, showing that the species are probably staying away from areas with human activity. No banteng were found in Cat Tien National Park. Of the other wild buffalo species the Critically Endangered kouprey Bos sauveli and Endangered water buffalo Bubalus arnee were not observed in the three protected areas but the Near Threatened serow Capricornis milneedwardsii was occasionally observed in all three areas. Illegal hunting, habitat degradation and disturbance appear to be the most significant threats to gaur and banteng in the areas surveyed. It is essential to have effective law enforcement to eliminate human impacts on these two species, and an adequate conservation strategy to secure their long-term survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0030605307000440

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of B. gaurus in Vietnam are confined to Cat Tien National Park.

    “The majority of B. gaurus in Vietnam are confined to Cat Tien National Park (Polet and Ling 2004;Nguyen 2009).”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Nguyen 2009

    The Cat Tien National Park section reports 86 gaur, and the Results report 121 across the three surveyed protected areas, so Cat Tien held a majority of those observed. The paper does not establish that a majority of all gaur in Vietnam were confined to the park; its Introduction also describes gaur in other areas. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. D A N G , H.H. & T R A N , A.T. (1991) Preliminary results of estimating population of banteng (Bos javanicus) in dry dipterocarp forest in Yok Don, Dak Lak province. Journal of Biology, 13, 30-36.
  2. N G U Y E N , M.H. & N G U Y E N , H.H. (2005) Results of wild cattle (Bos spp.) survey in Binh Phuoc province. Journal of Biology, 27, 60-62.
  3. N G U Y E N , M.H. & N G U Y E N , Q.T. (2004) Assessment of the status of hunting and trade in wildlife in Drang Phok village, Krong Ana communue, Buon Don district, Dak Lak province. In Proceedings of Scientific Workshop on Natural Resources and Environment 2003-2004 (eds Q.H. Truong & B.Q. Pham), pp. 63-69. Science and Technique, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  4. P R A Y U R A S I D D H I , T. (1997) The ecological separation of gaur (Bos gaurus) and banteng (Bos javanicus) in Huai Kha Khaeng Sanctuary, Thailand. PhD thesis, University of Minnesota, Twin, USA.
  5. T H A C H , M.H. & N G U Y E N , M.H. (2005) Survey on wild bovines (Bovidae spp.) in Bu Gia Map National Park (Binh Phuoc province) and Nam Nung Nature Reserve (Dak Nong province). Journal of Science, 29, 103-107.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, M. H.
Affiliations
Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VN)
Corresponding author
Nguyen, Manh Ha
Venue
Oryx
Published
2009-01
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
129-135
ISSN
  • 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3008
OpenAlex
W2003680405
Cited by
24
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Oryx (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nagao Natural Environment Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
gaur, Bos gaurus, banteng, Bos javanicus, wild buffalo, population status, herd size, species distribution, human disturbance, poaching, habitat degradation, water buffalo, serow, protected areas, conservation threats, Cat Tien National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review