The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pangloss revisited: a critique of the dilution effect and the biodiversity-buffers-disease paradigm
Abstract
SUMMARY: The twin concepts of zooprophylaxis and the dilution effect originated with vector-borne diseases (malaria), were driven forward by studies on Lyme borreliosis and have now developed into the mantra “biodiversity protects against disease”. The basic idea is that by diluting the assemblage of transmission-competent hosts with non-competent hosts, the probability of vectors feeding on transmission-competent hosts is reduced and so the abundance of infected vectors is lowered. The same principle has recently been applied to other infectious disease systems – tick-borne, insect-borne, indirectly transmitted via intermediate hosts, directly transmitted. It is claimed that the presence of extra species of various sorts, acting through a variety of distinct mechanisms, causes the prevalence of infectious agents to decrease. Examination of the theoretical and empirical evidence for this hypothesis reveals that it applies only in certain circumstances even amongst tick-borne diseases, and even less often if considering the correct metric – abundance rather than prevalence of infected vectors. Whether dilution or amplification occurs depends more on specific community composition than on biodiversity per se . We warn against raising a straw man, an untenable argument easily dismantled and dismissed. The intrinsic value of protecting biodiversity and ecosystem function outweighs this questionable utilitarian justification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global trends in emerging infectious diseases
Jones, K. E., Patel, N. G., Levy, M. A., Storeygard, A., Balk, D., Gittleman, J. L., & Daszak, P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06536 · Cited by 8,338
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants
Elton, C. S. (1958) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7214-9 · Cited by 4,285
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants.
Richards, P. W., & Elton, C. S. (1959) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2257385 · Cited by 3,905
The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes
Tilman, D., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Reich, P., Ritchie, M., & Siemann, E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5330.1300 · Cited by 3,199
Managing the health effects of climate change
Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell, S., Bellamy, R., Friel, S., Groce, N., Johnson, A., Kett, M., et al. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60935-1 · Cited by 3,102
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants
Elton, C. C. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5851-7 · Cited by 2,465
Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., & Knops, J. M. H. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04742 · Cited by 2,311
Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases
Keesing, F., Belden, L. K., Daszak, P., Dobson, A., Harvell, C. D., Holt, R. D., Hudson, P., Jolles, A., Jones, K. E., Mitchell, C. E., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09575 · Cited by 2,043
Self-citationHost Range and Emerging and Reemerging Pathogens
Woolhouse, M. E. J., & Gowtage-Sequeria, S. (2005) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1112.050997 · Cited by 1,586
Effects of species diversity on disease risk
Keesing, F., Holt, R. D., & Ostfeld, R. S. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00885.x · Cited by 1,556
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1016/S0147-9571(99)00015-6 · doi:10.1016/s0147-9571(99)00015-6
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.014 · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.11.014
- L, 1759, Candide
- 10.1089/vbz.2010.0007 · doi:10.1089/vbz.2010.0007
- 10.1017/S0007485300014607 · doi:10.1017/s0007485300014607
- 10.1017/S003118200800036X · doi:10.1017/s003118200800036x
- 10.1002/jmv.21929 · doi:10.1002/jmv.21929
- 10.1007/s00442-006-0537-6 · doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0537-6
- Kimura, 1995, Detection of Lyme disease spirochetes in the skin of naturally infected wild sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) by PCR, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 1641, 10.1128/AEM.61.4.1641-1642.1995 · doi:10.1128/aem.61.4.1641-1642.1995
- Jensen, 2000, Temporal risk assessment for Lyme borreliosis in Denmark, Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 35, 539
- Hubálek, 1998, Prevalence rates of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in host-seeking Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe, Parasitology Research, 84, 167, 10.1007/s004360050378 · doi:10.1007/s004360050378
- 10.1128/AEM.01567-07 · doi:10.1128/aem.01567-07
- 10.1603/ME10180 · doi:10.1603/me10180
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960206.x · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960206.x
- 10.1093/jmedent/45.5.867 · doi:10.1093/jmedent/45.5.867
- 10.1093/jmedent/27.6.945 · doi:10.1093/jmedent/27.6.945
- 10.1017/S0031182099006241 · doi:10.1017/s0031182099006241
- 10.1038/465859a · doi:10.1038/465859a
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02003.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02003.x
- 10.1093/jmedent/43.6.1142 · doi:10.1093/jmedent/43.6.1142
- Apperson, 1993, Relative utilization of reptiles and rodents as hosts by immature Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in the coastal plain of North Carolina, USA, Experimental and Applied Acarology, 17, 719, 10.1007/BF00051830 · doi:10.1007/bf00051830
- Sbrana, 2005, Oral transmission of West Nile virus in a hamster model, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 72, 325, 10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.325 · doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.325
- 10.1603/022.038.0404 · doi:10.1603/022.038.0404
- 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00317.x · doi:10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00317.x
- 10.3201/eid0704.017417 · doi:10.3201/eid0704.017417
Cited by
Global hotspots and correlates of emerging zoonotic diseases
Allen, T., Murray, K. A., Zambrana-Torrelio, C., Morse, S. S., Rondinini, C., Di Marco, M., Breit, N., Olival, K. J., & Daszak, P. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00923-8 · Cited by 1,124
The One Health Concept: 10 Years Old and a Long Road Ahead
Destoumieux-Garzón, D., Mavingui, P., Boetsch, G., Boissier, J., Darriet, F., Duboz, P., Fritsch, C., Giraudoux, P., Le Roux, F., Morand, S., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00014 · Cited by 992
Biodiversity inhibits parasites: Broad evidence for the dilution effect
Civitello, D. J., Cohen, J., Fatima, H., Halstead, N. T., Liriano, J., McMahon, T. A., Ortega, C. N., Sauer, E. L., Sehgal, T., Young, S., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1506279112 · Cited by 758
The effect of global change on mosquito-borne disease
Franklinos, L. H. V., Jones, K. E., Redding, D. W., & Abubakar, I. (2019) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(19)30161-6 · Cited by 641
Aerts, R., Honnay, O., & Van Nieuwenhuyse, A. (2018) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldy021 · Cited by 521
Metadata
- Authors
- RANDOLPH, S. E., & DOBSON, A. D. M.
- Venue
- Parasitology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-02-16
- Volume
- 139
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 847-863
- ISSN
- 0031-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8161
- OpenAlex
- W2166483540
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 23.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pangloss revisited: a critique of the dilution effect and the biodiversity-buffers-disease paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0031182012000200
- The paper
- RANDOLPH, S. E., & DOBSON, A. D. M. (2012). Pangloss revisited: a critique of the dilution effect and the biodiversity-buffers-disease paradigm. Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182012000200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
