Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 703

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A semi-structured clinical interview for the assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly: the Geriatric Mental State Schedule: I. Development and reliability

Copeland, J. R. M., Kelleher, M. J., Kellett, J. M., Gourlay, A. J., Gurland, B. J., Fleiss, J. L., Sharpe, L.·1976·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Synopsis: A standardized, semi-structured interview for examining and recording the mental state in elderly subjects is described. It allows the classification of patients by symptom profile and can demonstrate changes in that profile over time. It is believed that good reliability is demonstrated between psychiatric raters both for psychiatric diagnosis made on the basis of the schedule findings and for individual items. The Geriatric Mental State Schedule (GMS) consists mainly of items from the eighth edition of the PSE (Wing et al. 1967), together with additional items from the PSS (Spitzer et al. 1964), and extra sections dealing with disorientation and other cognitive abnormalities. Modifications have been introduced to facilitate interviewing elderly subjects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700015889

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Copeland, 1977, Syndromes of Depression and Distress: a Study of Traditional and Mathematical Groupings
  2. 10.1176/ajp.125.7S.12 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/archpsyc.1968.01740060106013 · DOI
  4. 10.1017/S0033291700015890 · DOI
  5. 10.1192/bjp.126.6.560 · doi:10.1192/bjp.126.6.560
  6. 10.1007/BF00577836 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cooper, 1972, Psychiatric Diagnosis in New York and London
  9. 10.1192/bjp.126.1.11 · doi:10.1192/bjp.126.1.11
  10. 10.1192/bjp.119.553.647 · DOI
  11. Gurland, 1975, A comparison of the outcome of hospitalization of geriatric patients in public psychiatric wards in New York and London, Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal
  12. 10.1192/bjp.126.5.423 · doi:10.1192/bjp.126.5.423
  13. 10.1136/bmj.3.5775.599 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1007/BF00402639 · doi:10.1007/bf00402639
  15. 10.1016/S0010-440X(64)80048-1 · DOI
  16. 10.1192/bjp.113.498.499 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wing, 1970, The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms
  18. 1972, Schizophrenia: Report on an International Pilot Study

Cited by

See all 703

Metadata

Authors
Copeland, J. R. M., Kelleher, M. J., Kellett, J. M., Gourlay, A. J., Gurland, B. J., Fleiss, J. L., & Sharpe, L.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1976-08
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
439-449
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2110800385
Cited by
703
References
1
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A semi-structured clinical interview for the assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly: the Geriatric Mental State Schedule: I. Development and reliability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291700015889
The paper
Copeland, J. R. M., Kelleher, M. J., Kellett, J. M., Gourlay, A. J., Gurland, B. J., Fleiss, J. L., & Sharpe, L. (1976). A semi-structured clinical interview for the assessment of diagnosis and mental state in the elderly: the Geriatric Mental State Schedule: I. Development and reliability. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700015889

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.