Cited by 17Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCrime Patterns and Interventions

Features of children taken to juvenile court for failure to attend school

Berg, Ian, Butler, Alan, Hullin, Roy, Smith, Rebecca, Tyrer, Stephen·1978·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

The social reports on 84 children taken to court for failure to attend school were studied. Independent raters were able to assess reliably the presence and absence of a variety of variables concerned with the individual's behaviour, school, family, and involvement with social work agencies. In 68 instances teacher's questionnaires measuring psychiatric disturbance had been completed. There was no evidence that truancy in these circumstances is a homogenous condition. At least 3 independent sets of features appear to be involved in most cases. One involves antisocial and educational problems ('clinical truancy'), a second is concerned with adverse social factors and parental complicity ('school withdrawal'), and a third set includes a tendency to social isolation ('school refusal'). There was no evidence that individuals tend to exhibit one of these features to the exclusion of the others.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700016123

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Berg et al. (1978) factor analytic study of youth with school attendance problems yielded a factor labeled school withdrawal because of substantial loadings of variables related to parental compliance and adverse social factors.

    “A factor that emerged from Berg, Butler, Hullin, Smith, and Tyrer's (1978) factor analytic study of youth with SAPs was labeled SW because of the substantial loadings of variables related to parental compliance and adverse social factors.”

    From Differentiation between school attendance problems: why and how? (2019) · cites this paper as Berg et al. (1978)

  • Berg et al. (1978) principal component analysis found four categories: a school refusal-related factor, a school withdrawal factor, a truancy factor, and conduct disturbances.

    “Four categories were found: (1) a SR-related factor labeled”

    From Differentiation between school attendance problems: why and how? (2019) · cites this paper as Berg et al. (1978)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg, I., Butler, A., Hullin, R., Smith, R., & Tyrer, S.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Berg, Ian
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1978-08
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
447-453
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2055925815
Cited by
17
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
school refusal, truancy, juvenile courts, antisocial behavior, psychiatric disturbances, social isolation, school withdrawal, family factors, teacher survey
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Achievement, Adolescent, Age Factors, Attitude, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Rearing, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Jurisprudence, Male, Parents, Psychosocial Deprivation, Sex Factors, Social Isolation, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review