Cited by 148Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Epidemiology of unexplained fatigue and major depression in the community: the Baltimore ECA follow-up, 1981-1994

ADDINGTON, A. M., GALLO, J. J., FORD, D. E., EATON, W. W.·2001·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. Fatigue is a common, non-specific, subjective symptom associated with several medical and psychiatric illnesses. The purpose of this investigation was to explore further the epidemiology of unexplained fatigue in the general population and the relationship between fatigue and depression. Methods. The design was a prospective population-based study. Subjects included community-dwelling adults who were participants of the Baltimore sample of the Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program in 1981 and who were reinterviewed 13 years later. Lay interviewers using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule interviewed subjects. Results. Number of somatization symptoms and history of a dysphoric episode at baseline were the two strongest predictors of both new onset of fatigue as well as recurrent/chronic fatigue over the 13-year follow-up interval. In addition, individuals who reported a history of unexplained fatigue at baseline as well as during the follow-up, were at markedly increased risk for new onset major depression as compared to those who never reported such fatigue, (RR = 28·4, 95% CI) (11·7, 68·0). Similarly, respondents who developed new fatigue or had remitted fatigue after 1981 were also at increased risk for developing major depression. Conclusions. Somatization was the strongest predictor of both new and chronic fatigue with unknown cause. In addition, fatigue was both predictive and a consequence of the depression syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291701004214

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ADDINGTON, A. M., GALLO, J. J., FORD, D. E., & EATON, W. W.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2001-07-31
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1037-1044
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2149374445
Cited by
148
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH047447, MH 47447)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
unexplained fatigue, major depressive disorder, somatization, chronic fatigue, community-dwelling adults, longitudinal follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Baltimore, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review